2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10957-016-0877-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Convergence Properties of a Majorized Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers for Linearly Constrained Convex Optimization Problems with Coupled Objective Functions

Abstract: In this paper, we establish the convergence properties for a majorized alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) for linearly constrained convex optimization problems whose objectives contain coupled functions. Our convergence analysis relies on the generalized Mean-Value Theorem which plays an important role to properly control the cross terms due to the presence of coupled objective functions. Our results in particular show that directly applying 2-block ADMM with a large step length to the linearly… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof. The inclusion (7) follows from the last statement in Lemma 3.1. Let us now show that (8) holds.…”
Section: Let Us First Introduce the Elements Required By The Setting mentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Proof. The inclusion (7) follows from the last statement in Lemma 3.1. Let us now show that (8) holds.…”
Section: Let Us First Introduce the Elements Required By The Setting mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In section 3.2, we will show that a generalized ADMM can be seen as an instance of the HPE framework specifying, in particular, how this triple (z k ,z k , η k ) can be obtained. Third, if M is positive definite and σ = η 0 = 0, then (8) implies that η k = 0 and z k =z k for every k, and hence that M (z k−1 − z k ) ∈ T (z k ) in view of (7). Therefore, the HPE error conditions (7)-(8) can be viewed as a relaxation of an iteration of the exact proximal point method.…”
Section: A Hpe-type Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, (a) follows from the above inequality, the fact that 0 ∈ T (z * ) and r k ∈ T (z k ) (see (10)), and the monotonicity of T . (b) Using (a), (8) and Assumption 2.1, we find…”
Section: A Proof Of Theorems 22 and 23mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With (34) it is easy to verify that Assumptions 2 and 3 can be satisfied. In the simulation setup, we let the number of agents N = 10 with connections |E | = 15, the number of training samples b i = 10 (∀i ∈ V), input and output dimension n = 10, ν = 1.…”
Section: A Convergence Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%