Mixtures of [Ph3PNPPh3]+Cl− with CuBr2 (or CuBr2+CuCl2) in ethanol/dichloromethane yield crystals containing three‐coordinate copper(II) with mixed chloride and bromide ligands, namely [Ph3PNPPh3]+[CuCl0.9Br2.1]− (1) and [Ph3PNPPh3]+[CuCl2.4Br0.6]− (2). The trigonal‐planar coordination of copper(II) is angularly distorted but unambiguous, as there is no other halide ligand within 6.7 Å of the copper atom. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations on planar [CuClBr2]− show that the energy surface for angle bending is very soft. Crystallisation in the presence of CH3CN yields [Ph3PNPPh3]+[CuCl0.7Br2.3(NCCH3)]− (3), in which there is additional secondary coordination by NCCH3 (Cu−N 2.44 Å). DFT calculations of the potential energy surface for this secondary coordination show that it is remarkably flat (<3 kcal mol−1 for a variation of Cu−N by 0.8 Å). The crystal packing in 1, 2 and 3, which involves multiple phenyl embraces between [Ph3PNPPh3]+ ions and numerous C−H⋅⋅⋅Cl and C−H⋅⋅⋅Br motifs, is associated with intermolecular energies that are larger than the variations in intramolecular energies. For reference, the crystal structures of [Ph3PNPPh3+]2[Cu2Cl6]2− (4) and [Ph3PNPPh3+]2[Cu2Br6]2− (5) are described. We conclude 1) that three‐coordinate copper(II) with monatomic halide ligands, although uncommon, can be regarded as normal, 2) that steric control by ligands is not necessary to enforce three‐coordination, 3) that a hydrophobic aryl environment stabilises [Cu(Cl/Br)3]−, and 4) that the energy change in the transition from three‐ to four‐coordinate copper(II) is very small (ca 5 kcal mol−1).