Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians (ICM 2018) 2019
DOI: 10.1142/9789813272880_0030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Crossroads of Enumerative Geometry and Geometric Representation Theory

Abstract: The subjects in the title are interwoven in many different and very deep ways. I recently wrote several expository accounts [64-66] that reflect a certain range of developments, but even in their totality they cannot be taken as a comprehensive survey. In the format of a 30-page contribution aimed at a general mathematical audience, I have decided to illustrate some of the basic ideas in one very interesting example -that of HilbpC 2 , nq, hoping to spark the curiosity of colleagues in those numerous fields of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We state this result in Theorem [1.3.1] below. For recent mathematical surveys of the classical and quantum periodic Benjamin-Ono equations, see §5.2 in Saut [51] and §1.1.6 in Okounkov [46], respectively.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We state this result in Theorem [1.3.1] below. For recent mathematical surveys of the classical and quantum periodic Benjamin-Ono equations, see §5.2 in Saut [51] and §1.1.6 in Okounkov [46], respectively.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comments on Hilbert Schemes of Points on Surfaces. Our notation ε in (1.1), ε 1 in (1.9), ε 2 in (1.10), and a in (3.2) reflect the appearance of the quantum periodic Benjamin-Ono equation in equivariant cohomology of Hilbert schemes of points in C 2 reviewed in §1.1.6 of Okounkov [46]. To interpret our Theorem [1.3.1] in this context, note that our coefficient of classical dispersion ε = ε 1 +ε 2 is the deformation parameter of the Maulik-Okounkov Yangian [34] while our coefficient of quantization = −ε 2 ε 1 is the handle-gluing element in [34].…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fugacity for C * ⊂ T 2 Angular momentum refinement, q Rotations of P 1 Vortex number Quasimap degree d K-theoretic PT vertex. Quasimaps to the Hilbert scheme of N points in C 2 correspond to points in the K-theoretic PT moduli space of C 3 [52,53]. The equivariant Euler characteristics (3.22) are then identified with the bare 1-leg vertex and following the notation of e.g.…”
Section: Adhm Vorticesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our ε in (1.1) is chosen to match the standard notation ε = ε 1 + ε 2 in Nekrasov's Omega background [59], a gauge theory known to be related to a quantization of (1.1) with = −ε 1 ε 2 . For a recent discussion of (1.1) from this point of view, see §1.1.6 in Okounkov [63]. We study this quantization of the classical periodic Benjamin-Ono equation in [55] where we derive exact Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization conditions on the classical multi-phase solutions (1.13).…”
Section: Comments On Dispersion Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%