2001
DOI: 10.1002/tea.1018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the cultural validity of science assessments

Abstract: We propose the concept of cultural validity as a form of test validity in science assessment. The conceptual relevance of cultural validity is supported by evidence that culture and society shape an individual's mind and thinking. To attain cultural validity, the process of assessment development must consider how the sociocultural context in which students live influences the ways in which they make sense of science items and the ways in which they solve them. These sociocultural influences include the values… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
117
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
117
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…There are two broad categories of these kinds of studies -studies that focus on particular skills (e.g., writing, reading comprehension), and studies that explore cultural differences in problem-solving (Duran, 1989), the effects of cultural schemata (Parry, 1987;Pritchard, 1990), acculturational factors (Ortiz, 2005), cultural validity (Solano-Flores & Nelson-Barber, 2001), background knowledge (Clapham, 1998;Ginther & Stevens, 1998;Jennings, Fox, Graves, & Shohamy, 1999), and 'situatedness' (Atkinson, 2005, pp. 50-51).…”
Section: Test Validation and Student Accountsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two broad categories of these kinds of studies -studies that focus on particular skills (e.g., writing, reading comprehension), and studies that explore cultural differences in problem-solving (Duran, 1989), the effects of cultural schemata (Parry, 1987;Pritchard, 1990), acculturational factors (Ortiz, 2005), cultural validity (Solano-Flores & Nelson-Barber, 2001), background knowledge (Clapham, 1998;Ginther & Stevens, 1998;Jennings, Fox, Graves, & Shohamy, 1999), and 'situatedness' (Atkinson, 2005, pp. 50-51).…”
Section: Test Validation and Student Accountsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, although conducting scientific inquiry is a challenge for most students, it presents additional challenges for students from societies that may not encourage them to engage in some aspects of inquiry practices, such as asking empirical questions about natural phenomena, designing and implementing systematic investigations, and finding answers on their own (e.g., Jegede & Okebukola, 1991;McKinley, Waiti, & Bell, 1992;Nelson-Barber & Estrin, 1995;Solano-Flores & Nelson-Barber, 2001). In many societies, cultural norms prioritize respect for teachers and other adults as authoritative sources of knowledge.…”
Section: Purpose and Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literacy educators and scholars would do well to consider the sociocultural and historical contexts of less-dominant language groups in addition to providing linguistic supports for minority students (Solano-Flores, 2008;Solano-Flores & Nelson-Barber, 2001). Educational resources and programmes that include open, explicit conversations about sociohistorical events and policies associated with the LL may help to expose stereotypes that favour dominant language groups within a school community.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%