2001
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-41240-0_35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Cuspidal Cohomology of S -Arithmetic Subgroups of Reductive Groups over Number Fields

Abstract: Let G be a reductive algebraic group defined over a number field k. A k-automorphism of G is said to be of Cartan-type if, at achimedean places, it differs from a Cartan involution by an inner automorphism. In [1] the following result regarding the existence of non-trivial cuspidal cohomology classes for S-arithmetic subgroups of G is proved:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0
8

Year Published

2003
2003
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
42
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The functorial lifts used were base change for GL 2 and the symmetric square lifting of Gelbart and Jacquet. This was generalized for SL n over E, in conjunction with Borel [5]; with the additional input of base change for GL n . (2) Motivated by [26], Clozel [7] used automorphic induction and proved the existence of nontrivial cuspidal cohomology classes for SL 2n over any number field.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The functorial lifts used were base change for GL 2 and the symmetric square lifting of Gelbart and Jacquet. This was generalized for SL n over E, in conjunction with Borel [5]; with the additional input of base change for GL n . (2) Motivated by [26], Clozel [7] used automorphic induction and proved the existence of nontrivial cuspidal cohomology classes for SL 2n over any number field.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, by the construction of cuspidal automorphic representations and related cohomology classes for arithmetic subgroups of GL n over an algebraic number field ( [80], resp. [21]), there are nonvanishing results for the cohomology in degrees which cannot be detected by any modular symbol of type L, L a Levi subgroup of G. Second, modular symbols of a different type can contribute to cohomology in the same cohomological degree.…”
Section: Cornersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The space V G is a (g, K ; G(A f ))-module and admits a decomposition V G = {P}∈C V G ({P}) as a finite direct sum of (g, K ; G(A f ))-modules as proved by Langlands (cf. [2]). This decomposition descends to the submodule A E , that is…”
Section: Decomposition Along the Cuspidal Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, let Q ∈ {P} and π be an irreducible representation of L Q (A), unitary modulo the center, and such that (1) the central character χ π : A Q (A) → C × is trivial on A Q (Q), (2)π occurs in the cuspidal summand • L 2 (L Q (Q)\L Q (A)) χ π and (3) the infinitesimal character of π matches the infinitesimal character of the dual representationĚ. These conditions entail some compatibility requirements (cf.…”
Section: Decomposition Along the Cuspidal Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%