1962
DOI: 10.54991/jop.1962.614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the cuticle of Dicroidium (Thinnfeldia) sahnii (Seward) with some observations on the genera Thinnfeldia and Dicroidium

Abstract: The cuticular features of two specimens of Thinnfeldia sahnii are described as far as available. On the basis of this data it is suggested that T. sahnii may really belong to the genus Dicroidium. The early history of these two genera is briefly outlined and certain connected problems discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also in D. hughesii some of the cells are papillate and stomata are more on one surface. D. sahnii (Seward) Rao & Lele (1962) is distinguished from the present species by the presence of papillate cells and also in having fewer number of subsidiary cells. D. nidpurensis comes closer to D. obtusifolium (Johnston) Townrow (1966) in having mostly smooth walled cells, but the latter species differs from the former in having only 4 subsidiary cells but usually one or both lateral subsidiary cells are divided radially.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also in D. hughesii some of the cells are papillate and stomata are more on one surface. D. sahnii (Seward) Rao & Lele (1962) is distinguished from the present species by the presence of papillate cells and also in having fewer number of subsidiary cells. D. nidpurensis comes closer to D. obtusifolium (Johnston) Townrow (1966) in having mostly smooth walled cells, but the latter species differs from the former in having only 4 subsidiary cells but usually one or both lateral subsidiary cells are divided radially.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…4-5. Besides these species, D. papillosum also resembles to some extent D. narrabeenensis Walkom (1925) described by Jacob & Jacob (1950), D. sup.erb.um (Shirley) Tcwnrow (1957), D. conactum (Johnston) Townrow (1957), D. hughesii (Feistmantel) Townrow (1957) described by Lele (1961) and D. sahnii (Seward) Rao & Lele (1962) in having papillatt:< cells. But in all the latter mentioned species papillae are rather rare.…”
Section: Holotype -No 33952mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…1, figs 1, 2, 4-7; text-figs 2 A, B; 3 A-C; 4 A-C) as D. odontopteroides have been assigned to D. zuberi with respect to the shape of lamina segments, venation pattern and epidermal features. Specimens of D. sahni described by Rao and Lele (1963) and those of Dicroidium sp. cf.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genus becomes a common element of fossil assemblages in Spathian strata (RETALLACK 1977;HOLMES & ASH 1979) and dominates floras in succeeding strata up to theend-Triassic extinction horizon (BALME et al 1995). Dicroidium has its centre of distribution in the middle and high palaeolatitudes of Gondwana, with particularly large collections described from the Middle to Upper Triassic of South Africa (DU TOIT 1927;THOMAS 1933;ANDERSON & ANDERSON 1983), South America (FRENGUELLI 1943(FRENGUELLI , 1944bBORTOLUZZI & BARBERENA 1967;ARCHANGELSKY 1968;PETRIELLA 1981;GUERRA-SOMMER & CAZZULO KLEPZIG 2000), Antarctica (TOWNROW 1967;BOUCHER et al 1993;BOMFLEUR & KERP 2010;ESCAPA et al 2011;BOMFLEUR et al 2012), India (e.g., FEISTMANTEL 1879aPAL et al 2014;RAO & LELE 1962;SEWARD 1932), Australia (e.g., WALKOM 1917, 1925a, 1928JONES & DE JERSEY 1947;TOWNROW 1957;HOLMES & ANDERSON 2005;PATTEMORE 2016), and New Zealand (e.g., ARBER 1913RETALLACK 1980b).…”
Section: [Full Column Table 1]mentioning
confidence: 99%