2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmacro.2018.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the cyclicality of R&D activities

Abstract: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The labor force growth rate, λ, for the US is 1% per year. The parameter η is set to 0.55 to match the return to labor in R&D in the US based on NSF data (Mand, 2019). Following Lee and Mukoyama (2015), establishment-level relative productivity of entrants is on average 0.96. β = 0.987 is selected to match, anticipating a growth rate of per capita consumption of 2.6%, a real rate of return of approximately 4% (Gomme et al, 2011).…”
Section: Externally Calibrated Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The labor force growth rate, λ, for the US is 1% per year. The parameter η is set to 0.55 to match the return to labor in R&D in the US based on NSF data (Mand, 2019). Following Lee and Mukoyama (2015), establishment-level relative productivity of entrants is on average 0.96. β = 0.987 is selected to match, anticipating a growth rate of per capita consumption of 2.6%, a real rate of return of approximately 4% (Gomme et al, 2011).…”
Section: Externally Calibrated Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent study, Mand (2019) proposes a new mechanism for explaining the pro-cyclicality of R&D. He develops a real business cycle model with endogenous innovation, but uses a specification that allows for multiple inputs including scientists, staff and final goods which complement each other. As goods are scarcer in 2 Also related to the Schumpeterian growth literature, there is long-standing research that analyses the role of innovation over the business cycle and over long waves of technical change (Rosenberg and Frischtak 1984;Perez 2010).…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%