1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0273-1177(98)00116-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the day-to-day variation of foF2 and M(3000)F2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
14

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
36
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be related to an enhancement in the foF2 variability during the spring and autumn months. (Kouris et al, 1998(Kouris et al, , 1999.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This could be related to an enhancement in the foF2 variability during the spring and autumn months. (Kouris et al, 1998(Kouris et al, , 1999.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be due to the fact that the variability of M(3000)F2 is much lower than that of foF2. (Kouris et al, 1998(Kouris et al, , 1999 The performance of the M(3000)F2 mapping models are presented in Fig. 6.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geophysicae 16, 1039 -1042(1998) © EGS -Springer-Verlag 1998 Letter to the Editor Abstract. Daily values of the ionospheric characteristics fo F2 and M(3000)F2 for a given hour and month are correlated with the corresponding daily values of sunspot number using measured data collected at seven European locations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the diurnal and seasonal trends in the correlation coefficients are found to be in the same sense whether dealing with daily or monthly median values, and this fact prompts us to attribute the observed differences to the influences of other effects than ionisation production in dominating the day-to-day variability of these two ionospheric characteristics. For example, at middle latitudes ionospheric disturbances can depress or enhance foF2 by more than 50% in some particular days (Kouris et al, 1998) such that a multiple regression of two variables, for instance R and the geomagnetic Ap index as advocated for the monthly median values by Kane (1992), might substantially improve the daily correlation. If so, this suggests that formulations based also on magnetic activity could be valuable in improving shortterm ionospheric forecasts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier catalog of disturbed periods has been based on the selection of 3 h or longer for the mean relative deviation of NmF2 greater than ±40% which corresponds to the requirement for foF2 deviation to exceed the monthly median by ±20% (Kouris et al, 1998). Such an analysis could be performed on a monthly basis upon the end of each month when the monthly median could be obtained.…”
Section: Ionospheric Disturbed Periodsmentioning
confidence: 99%