2002
DOI: 10.1007/s00220-002-0671-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Density-Density Critical Indices�in Interacting Fermi Systems

Abstract: The behaviour of correlation functions of d = 1 interacting fermionic systems is determined by a small number of critical indices. We prove that one of them is exactly zero. As a consequence, the behavior of the Fourier transform of the density-density correlation at zero momentum is qualitatively unaffected by the interaction, contrary to what happens at ±2p F , if pF is the Fermi momentum. The result is obtained by implementing Ward identities in a Renormalization Group approach.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
123
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
123
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also easy to see that (see [13], §3.4), since the propagator (77) satisfies the symmetry property…”
Section: Proof Of Lemma 21mentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is also easy to see that (see [13], §3.4), since the propagator (77) satisfies the symmetry property…”
Section: Proof Of Lemma 21mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The proof of the lemma is based on the RG analysis of the Grassmann integrals (24) and (29), described in [12,13] and [17,19], respectively.…”
Section: Proof Of Lemma 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, -T j 0 ,n,2m ϕ ,n J is a family of trees (identical to the those defined in §3.2 of [BM2], up to the (trivial) difference that the maximum scale of the vertices is N + 1 instead of +1), with root at scale j 0 , n normal endpoints (i.e. endpoints not associated to ϕ or J fields), n ϕ = 2m ϕ endpoints of type ϕ and n J endpoints of type J.…”
Section: Continuum Fermions With Cutoff 21 Renormalization Group Anamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; we refer to [BM2] §2.2 for its exact definition. We then substitute [C h,N (k)] −1 with [C ε h,N (k)] −1 in the r.h.s.…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%