Diversity and fairness have received increased attention in the field of personalization and recommendation (especially in the FairUMAP workshops). The two concepts are related. For instance, a diversification of recommended items is considered key to fairness. One example is the recommendation of search results. Presenting a diverse range of sources and representations of race and gender will increase justice towards populations that have previously been rendered invisible (Noble 2018).Initially, diversity in recommendations was a question of user satisfaction (we don't want to recommend the "same old" items (McNee, Riedl, and Konstan 2006)). Plus, diversity was used as a strategy to "optimize the chances that at least some item pleases the user" (Castells, Hurley, and Vargas 2015, 883) given the uncertainty about users' actual preferences.In this vein, methods such as re-ranking were developed "to achieve a balance between diversity and accuracy." Yet today, diversity is increasingly considered in fairness-related efforts (Sonboli et al. 2020a) and re-ranking is a tool to right wrongs in a recommender model. This paper deals with the relationship of diversity and fairness from a social justice point of view (not a user satisfaction point of view). Reviewing literature in the field, I investigate how diversity is leveraged in recommender systems and evaluate the implications for fairness from a Black feminist perspective. The paper finds that, while item diversity may be an effective tool to increase fairness, the way researchers in the field currently leverage 'user diversity' compromises these efforts. In particular, I argue that a naive employment of user diversity models may compound previous injustices. Concern arises especially from the common understanding of diversity categories (gender, age, education, skills, practices, personality) as neutral, individual-level characteristics.