2018
DOI: 10.1785/0120160295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Depth Extent of Coseismic Rupture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many factors including temperature, strain rate, pore fluid pressure, lithology, water content, fault geometry, and stress regime (Scholz, 1998; Sibson, 1984; Zoback & Townend, 2001) affect the depth of the BDT zone, which roughly corresponds to the maximum depths of low‐ and moderate‐magnitude seismicity (Chen & Molnar, 1983; Scholz, 1988; Sibson, 1982, 1984) and the depth to which rupture extends in large earthquakes (Jackson, 2002; Magistrale & Zhou, 1996; Sibson, 1982, 1984). Recent studies however have suggested that large earthquakes sometimes or always also rupture the deeper creeping section of the fault zone (Beeler et al., 2018; Jiang & Lapusta, 2016; Shaw & Wesnousky, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many factors including temperature, strain rate, pore fluid pressure, lithology, water content, fault geometry, and stress regime (Scholz, 1998; Sibson, 1984; Zoback & Townend, 2001) affect the depth of the BDT zone, which roughly corresponds to the maximum depths of low‐ and moderate‐magnitude seismicity (Chen & Molnar, 1983; Scholz, 1988; Sibson, 1982, 1984) and the depth to which rupture extends in large earthquakes (Jackson, 2002; Magistrale & Zhou, 1996; Sibson, 1982, 1984). Recent studies however have suggested that large earthquakes sometimes or always also rupture the deeper creeping section of the fault zone (Beeler et al., 2018; Jiang & Lapusta, 2016; Shaw & Wesnousky, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, aftershocks are sometimes recorded at depths slightly greater than those of the mainshock and of the background seismicity during 'quiescence' periods. Considering that the seismotectonic setting discussed by Rolandone et al [2004] and Beeler et al [2018] certainly smaller (and hence the coseismic slip is comparably shorter), iii) slip-and strain-rate are both more diffuse within the investigated crustal volumes than the only 100 m-thick shear zone assumed by the authors, a reasonable value of a sufficiently thick interposed ductile layer is 500 m.…”
Section: Methodological Approachmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…At this regard, seismological evidences [e.g. Rolandone et al, 2004] and mechanical-rheological modelling [Beeler et al, 2018] have proved that the embrittlement caused by the temporary increase of the strain rate after a major seismic event may result in a sudden and transient deepening of the BDT, with respect to the interseismic period depth, in the range of 1-3 km. Indeed, aftershocks are sometimes recorded at depths slightly greater than those of the mainshock and of the background seismicity during 'quiescence' periods.…”
Section: Methodological Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to define this transition, in the event that a deeper second brittle layer occurs, it is assumed that an interposed ductile layer with a thickness of at least 0.5 km is sufficient to mechanically decouple the two brittle layers in terms of seismogenic behaviour and hence seismic potential. In other words, a 0.5-km-thick interposed ductile layer could be considered an adequate 'obstacle' for hindering the propagation of a coseismic rupture from one brittle layer to another one along a hypothetical fault (Rolandone et al, 2004;Beeler et al, 2018), thus making the two hypothetically aligned segments independent of each other in seismological terms.…”
Section: Thermo-rheological Modelling For Oceanic and Continental Litmentioning
confidence: 99%