2019
DOI: 10.1177/0261927x19867739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Descriptive and Expressive Function of Derogatory Group Labels: An Experimental Test

Abstract: By using a pseudoword paradigm, we tested whether derogatory labels (e.g., pejorative labels addressing group members) differed from category labels and general slur in their descriptive (i.e., pointing to group membership) and expressive functions (i.e., perceived offensiveness and social acceptability). Results indicated that derogatory labels were similar to category labels in their descriptive function, and had higher expressive function than slurs. Participants’ prejudice toward the groups that were targe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research has found that derogatory labels affect prejudice and produce more negative evaluations of the group (Bianchi et al, 2019); it has also been reported that media users who were more exposed to online hate speech reported higher levels of Islamophobia (Bilewicz & Soral, 2020). There is also evidence in the current study to support Bales (2012, p. 11) that modern-day slavery (we might expand this to also include modern-day racism) focuses on "weakness, gullibility and deprivation" more than race per se.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has found that derogatory labels affect prejudice and produce more negative evaluations of the group (Bianchi et al, 2019); it has also been reported that media users who were more exposed to online hate speech reported higher levels of Islamophobia (Bilewicz & Soral, 2020). There is also evidence in the current study to support Bales (2012, p. 11) that modern-day slavery (we might expand this to also include modern-day racism) focuses on "weakness, gullibility and deprivation" more than race per se.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, discriminatory language is one way to activate and perpetuate prejudice against minority groups. This mechanism is illustrated by a set of studies in which people were exposed to, or subliminally primed with, homophobic labels, without being personally the target of the slur (e.g., Bianchi et al, 2019; Fasoli, Maass et al, 2015). These and related studies compared homophobic labels (e.g., “fag”) with neutral category labels describing the same category (e.g., “gay”).…”
Section: The Social Functions Of Derogatory Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A growing body of research is exploring the use of slurs, stereotypes, and other forms of race talk. These include statistical experimental and survey-based approaches (Bianchi et al, 2019; Jay and Jay, 2015; O’Dea and Saucier, 2017; Panzeri and Carrus, 2016; Rosette et al, 2013), discourse analysis of race talk in the media (Hill, 2008; Jackson, 2015), qualitative research-based in participant observations and interviews (Embrick and Henricks, 2013, 2015; Hughey, 2012; Myers, 2005), Autoethnography (Ellis, 2009), and fictionalized narratives (Bell, 1997; Delgado, 1995).…”
Section: Method: Nightmarish Autoethnographymentioning
confidence: 99%