IEEE INFOCOM 2014 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications 2014
DOI: 10.1109/infocom.2014.6848124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the design and analysis of Data Center Network architectures for interconnecting dual-port servers

Abstract: Abstract-We consider the design and analysis of Data Center Network (DCN) architectures for interconnecting dual-port servers. Unlike existing works, we propose the concept of Normalized Switch Delay (NSD) to distinguish a server-to-server-direct hop and a server-to-server-via-switch hop, to unify the design of DCN architectures. We then consider a fundamental problem: maximizing the number of dual-port servers, given network diameter and switch port number; and give an upper bound on this maximum number. Two … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Server centric architecture also has a switch but use the servers as a router. DCell [24], BCube [25], Ficonn [26], FlatNet [27], HCN & BCN [28], Dpillar [29], SWCube [30], FleCube [31,32], DCube [33], Fsquare [34] and sprintNet [35] are server-centric architecture. Using the switch in this kind of architecture may lead to bottleneck and increase cost and scalability of the network.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Server centric architecture also has a switch but use the servers as a router. DCell [24], BCube [25], Ficonn [26], FlatNet [27], HCN & BCN [28], Dpillar [29], SWCube [30], FleCube [31,32], DCube [33], Fsquare [34] and sprintNet [35] are server-centric architecture. Using the switch in this kind of architecture may lead to bottleneck and increase cost and scalability of the network.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The directly-connected architectures integrate networking in the multi-port servers, while architectures connected through switches rely on switches to forward data. According to [23] [12] [25], forwarding capacity on multi-port server in hardware is close to that of COTS switches per port, as mentioned in [22] with c=1 in normalized switch delay. Servers in architecture connected through switches are equipped with small number of ports, of which the typical value is 1, 2, 3, and 4; while servers in directly-connected architectures are equipped with more ports.…”
Section: E With Other Architecturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fat-tree [2], VL2 [11], Portland [26], Jellyfish [28], S2 [32], Scafida [17], Poincaré [8], and SWDC [27] belong to the former category, in which servers are attachments of switches fabric. DCell [14], BCube [13], CamCube [1] [7], FiConn [21], HCN&BCN [15], DPillar [24], SWCube&SWKautz [22], and FSquare [23] fall into server-centric category, in which servers undertake the task of processing and forwarding data. According to the usage of switch, server-centric architectures fall into two categories: with and without using switches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SWCube was proposed in [15], and the construction process of a SW Cube(n, k) is as follows: First, build a k dimensional generalized hypercube using n-port switches, denoted as H k r 1 ×r 2 ×···×r k where ri represents the radix of the i th dimension. Thus a node A can be represented by a k-tuple: A = a1a2 · · · a k , where ai ∈ [0, ri − 1], ∀i ∈ [1, k].…”
Section: Structures Of Ficonn Bcn and Swcubementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diameter of SW Cube(n, k) is k + 1. It is claimed in [15] that given the number of ports of a switch, n, with diameter less than or equal to d, SW Cube accommodates more servers than BCN.…”
Section: Structures Of Ficonn Bcn and Swcubementioning
confidence: 99%