2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0005-1098(01)00237-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the design of multivariable PID controllers via LMI approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
161
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 236 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
161
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Simulation results show clearly that Approach 2, described in [26], achieves globally the best compromise between robustness and performance tests compared to Approach 1, described in [24], especially with respect to the multiple time-delays influence test, set-point changes test and performance indices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Simulation results show clearly that Approach 2, described in [26], achieves globally the best compromise between robustness and performance tests compared to Approach 1, described in [24], especially with respect to the multiple time-delays influence test, set-point changes test and performance indices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…To tackle the problem of computing MIMO PID gain matrices, an Iterative Linear Matrix Inequality (ILMI) algorithm was proposed by [22] and later used to solve several MIMO PID controller design problems [23], [24], [25], [26], [27]. The basic idea is to transform a PID controller into an equivalent static output feedback (SOF) controller.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the authors of the literature, [1], [2], and [4], have introduced design methods based on the classical approach such as decoupling control or dominant pole placement for two-input two-output PI controller design [5]. The design methods based on the modern approach include those by pole placement [6]- [8], loop shaping for PI control [9], H 2 /H ∞ control [10], [11] or GKYP lemma [12] formulated with linear matrix inequalities, and numerical optimization [13], [14]. Lunze [15] has proposed a unique method that gives an I-gain matrix robustly stabilizable against a given bounded variation of the static transmission matrix of the plant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [14], a third approach for the design of an optimal PID controller is proposed, which involves solving a high-order static state-feedback problem and then reducing the size of the controller by retaining the "dominant" dynamics of the closed-loop system. Finally, in [15] and [16], a MIMO PID controller is obtained by solving a similar static output-feedback problem using linear matrix inequality (LMI) methods. A disadvantage with all of these techniques is that the controller synthesis requires solving various subproblems multiple times before obtaining a stabilizing controller (if one exists), and therefore the complexity of the procedures increases greatly with the system size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%