On the design of safer chemicals: a path forward

Abstract

The need for chemists to design chemicals that not only fulfill their intended purposes but are of minimal hazard was recognized nearly a century ago. Over the decades regulations pertaining to the development of safer drug substances and pesticides have been promulgated, and caused changes in the relationships between industry, academia, government agencies, and how chemists are trained to develop new pesticides and new drug substances. This has led to the considerable progress that has occurred over the past 60 years in the development of safe and efficacious pharmaceuticals and pesticides. Progress in the design of safer commercial chemicals, however, has been comparatively slow, despite the many advances in: toxicological research; the elucidation of mechanisms of toxicity; and the identification of relationships between chemical structure, physicochemical and electronic properties with toxicity, environmental fate, or environmental hazard. While few would argue against the need for safer commercial chemicals, implementation of the design of safer chemicals as a paradigm has not advanced to the same extent as other approaches to preventing pollution. This article offers insights on how this paradigm can be advanced as an important component of sustainable development, and how those existing commercial chemicals for which safer, commercially viable alternatives are most needed can be identified and prioritized. One recommendation regarding prioritization is the use of information available in the United States (U.S.) Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) Toxics Release Inventory (TRI): the U.S.' pollutant release and transfer register (PRTR). The TRI is an easy-to-use pollution prevention database tool used extensively for tracking the quantities of toxic chemicals annually released or otherwise managed as waste, and evaluating overall environmental performance by industrial facilities. Other PRTRs throughout the world have the potential to be used for identification and prioritization of chemicals as well.

Toward sustainable environmental quality: Identifying priority research questions for Latin America

“…Similarly, alternative analyses of multiple chemicals for common uses (Dorman et al ) can support chemical substitutions in commercial products that reduce risk to people and the environment (Zimmerman and Anastas ). Further, the design of industrial chemicals that maintain function but are inherently less hazardous can protect the environment and human health while providing economic incentives for the design of innovative chemicals and products that allow more sustainable development (DeVito ). Herein, significant multidisciplinary research is needed (Coish et al ), but the outcomes promise to be transformational for LA and other regions.…”

A Novel Eco-Friendly Wood Adhesive Composed by Sucrose and Ammonium Dihydrogen Phosphate

“…Most of these materials are manufactured by bonding the wooden elements together using synthetic resin adhesives. Examples of such resin adhesives include formaldehyde-based, isocyanate-based, vinyl acetate-based resins and so on, in which, many wood-based materials bonded by formaldehyde-based adhesives [2,3,4]. Recently, regulatory and consumer concerns about both formaldehyde emissions and a present dependency upon fossil-derived resources has spurred the wood industry to develop eco-friendly adhesives formulated from renewable and bio-resources based materials.…”

A general environmentally friendly access to long chain fatty acid ionic liquids (LCFA-ILs)

“…When a new chemical is proposed, as important as its potential applications are, the way it is prepared has to be carefully evaluated to determine whether, or to what extent, it respects the easy, efficient, inexpensive and green manufacture principles. [30] This analysis could completely counterbalance possible benefits of a new chemical, and render its synthesis and use ineffective in practice. For the reported LCFA-ILs, each synthetic procedure, apart from being developed for a narrow window of ILs, presents specific drawbacks (e.g.…”