2019 IEEE/ACM 41st International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icse-companion.2019.00110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Deterioration of Learning-Based Malware Detectors for Android

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting metrics are then used as features to train a classifier. We expect this evolution-informed classifier to achieve and sustain high classification accuracy over time, based on our prior works in this regard [17,18,29].…”
Section: Proactive Applications/toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The resulting metrics are then used as features to train a classifier. We expect this evolution-informed classifier to achieve and sustain high classification accuracy over time, based on our prior works in this regard [17,18,29].…”
Section: Proactive Applications/toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, this rapid evolution also causes challenges to mobile software engineers in developing and maintaining quality app products, and hence challenges to users concerning the usability and security of resulting mobile software. Two prominent examples of such evolution-induced challenges, among many others, are the quick deterioration of security defense tools for Android [10,14,16,29] and extensive compatibility issues with Android apps [23,50].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To understand the overtime classification performance of existing malware detection solutions, we chose six state-of-the-art malware detectors for Android. The baseline malware detectors for Android investigated are the two state-of-the-art dynamic app classifiers DroidSpan (Fu and Cai, 2019), Afonso (Afonso et al, 2015) and four state-of-the-art static approaches Ma-maDroid (Mariconti et al, 2017), DroidSieve (Suarez-Tangil et al, 2017), DroidAPIMiner (Aafer et al, 2013), Reveal-Droid (Garcia et al, 2018). MamaDroid and DroidAPIMiner uses features based on API calls in an app, extracted through static analysis.…”
Section: Towards Sustainable Android Malware Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the 16 datasets are mutually disjoint (there were no apps shared by any two datasets). The datasets are the same dataset used by DroidSpan (Fu and Cai, 2019) in investigating the deterioration of learning-based malware detectors for Android. Table 11 lists the F1 accuracy of each of the eight independent tests (noted in the first column) achieved by the proposed four security rules.…”
Section: Towards Sustainable Android Malware Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But it is not easy. In [5], the classification of applications is depending on the credence that malicious software can be determined, based on the confidence that, he proposed a machine learning system. But its accuracy was very low.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%