On the Determinants of Social Capital in Greece Compared to Countries of the European Union

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in On the Determinants of Social Capital in Greece Compared to Countries of the European Union SummarySocial capital refers to the stock of social relations, based on norms and networks of cooperation and trust that spill over to the market and state to enhance collective action between actors and achieve improved social efficiency and economic growth. The aim of the present paper is to discuss the implications of contemporary literature and empirical findings on social capital for the growth prospects of Greece, compared to the member-states of the European Union. In order to examine the potential of social capital to enhance growth, we must look into the factors that determine the nature and context of trust, norms and networks that have emerged in our multinational, multiethnic and multicultural Europe. The contribution of this paper is to offer insight on the determinants of social capital in Greece, compared to the European Union (EU -former 15 member-states). For this purpose, we regress an index of individual group membership, derived from the European Community Household Panel (ECHP), on a set of individual as well as aggregate factors of social capital. Regression results provide evidence of the impact of both individual and institutional characteristics on group membership. Differences on the extent of group membership between countries might be indicative of the historical and cultural differences that have affected the evolution of social capital across Europe. Particularly in Greece, the relatively low level of group membership compared to the other EU countries might provide further evidence of its low levels of civicness. Historically, its weak civil society has been a result of a prior civic tradition of clientelism under arbitrary rule, the interference of special-interest groups and the lack of credibility and impartiality from the part of the state. And these factors might be responsible for the slow pace in reform and growth observed compared to the rest of the EU. Nevertheless, the findings on the determinants of social capital may direct us to possible means of rebuilding patterns of participatory and cooperative behavior, especially in countries with low levels of trust and civicness, such as Greece.

Social capital and poverty in Uganda

“…This formulation is also in line with earlier studies such as Alesina & La Ferrara (2000) in the US, Christoforou (2004) in European countries and Haddad & Maluccio (2003) in South Africa that examined determinants of group memberships using income as one of the determinants.…”

“…The results show that lower trust reduces participation in open groups. Other important factors determining group participation that are mentioned in the literature are education, age, marital status and gender (Alesina & La Ferrara, 2000;Christoforou, 2004;Dasgupta, 2005;Mosley & Verschoor, 2005;Muriisa & Ishtiaq, 2007).…”

“…On the other hand, economics literature on social capital formation is limited. Alesina and La Ferrara (2000) in the US, Christoforou (2004) in Europe, and Haddad and Maluccio (2003) in South Africa show that group participation as a measure of social capital is determined by a host of factors such as education, homogeneity of communities, trust and other household characteristics. Studies of this nature are important for generating policies in support of social institutional building and thus poverty reduction.…”

Trust, Social and Personal Attitudes after Wildfires in a Rural Region of Greece

“…(Bourdieu, 1986;Coleman, 1988;Fukuyama, 2001;Putnam, Leonardi, & Nanetti, 1993). However, a number of studies which measure social capital in Greece agree that Greeks have a low social capital, and the lowest when it compared with other European citizens, with any operating definition or measured outcome used, for instance, trust in institutions, social trust, social networks, social norms, voluntary participation (Christoforou, 2005;Panagiotopoulou & Papliakou, 2007;Sotiropoulos & Karamagioli, 2005). In addition a study which investigated social capital for 13 Greek regions found that Peloponnesus (the area where the wildfires happened) was among the last three with the lowest social capital (Jones, Malesios, Iosifides, & Sophoulis, 2008).…”

Investigating the Physical Determinants of Social Capital and Their Implications for Sustainable Urban Development

“…Much of the work on the factors that determine social capital is limited to the 'softer' (social) issues rather than the physical environment (Christoforou, 2005;Glaesier, et al, 2002;Woolcock, et al, 2004). Perhaps the most significant single piece of work in this regard is that of the Saguaro Seminar, an initiative of Professor Robert Putnam at the John F. Kennedy School of Government at the Harvard University.…”