2018
DOI: 10.31276/vjste.60(1).03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the determination of the Singer transfer

Abstract: Abstract:Let P k be the graded polynomial algebra F 2 [x 1 , x 2 , . . . , x k ] with the degree of each generator x i being 1, where F2 denote the prime field of two elements, and let GL k be the general linear group over F 2 which acts regularly on P k .We study the algebraic transfer constructed by Singer [1] using the technique of the Peterson hit problem. This transfer is a homomorphism from the homology of the mod-2 Steenrod algebra A, Tor

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…al. [9], Chơn and Hà [11], Crossley [14], Hà [15], Hưng [19], Minami [26], Nam [31], the present author [41,42,43,44,46,47,48,49,50,51], Sum [61,62,63,65] and others). In [55], using the invariant theory, Singer claims that T r d is an isomorphism for d = 4 in a range of internal degrees, but T r 5 is not an epimorphism.…”
Section: A2mentioning
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…al. [9], Chơn and Hà [11], Crossley [14], Hà [15], Hưng [19], Minami [26], Nam [31], the present author [41,42,43,44,46,47,48,49,50,51], Sum [61,62,63,65] and others). In [55], using the invariant theory, Singer claims that T r d is an isomorphism for d = 4 in a range of internal degrees, but T r 5 is not an epimorphism.…”
Section: A2mentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Indeed, by using a computer calculation, Hưng provided a counter-example in [19] that Sq 0 is not a monomorphism when acting on Z/2 ⊗ GL5 P A2 H 15 (B(Z/2) ×5 ). This was confirmed again by the works of Sum [61,65]. Thereafter, Hưng [19] conjectured that Sq 0 is a monomorphism if and only if d ≤ 4.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This means that k ⊗ GL 4 (k) P ((P 4 ) * 2(2 1 −1)+2 1 ) is trivial. For s ∈ {2, 4}, combining Theorems 2.2, 2.9 with the inequality (8) and the fact that the invariant space (Q ⊗4 2 2−1 +2 2 −3 ) GL 4 (k) is trivial (see Sum [44]), it may be concluded that the coinvariant spaces k ⊗ GL 4 (k) P ((P 4 ) * 2(2 s −1)+2 s ) are trivial, too. For s ∈ {1, 2, 4}, the following inequality is immediate from Theorems 2.2 and 2.9 and the inequality ( 8): (10) dim k ⊗ GL 4 (k) P ((P 4 ) * 2(2 s −1)+2 s ) ≤ 1.…”
Section: Theorem 25 With a Positive Integer S We Havementioning
confidence: 99%
“…where P ((P q ) * n ) := {θ ∈ (P q ) * n : (θ)Sq i = 0, for all i > 0} = (Q ⊗q n ) * , the space of primitive homology classes as a representation of GL q (k) for all n and the coinvariant k⊗ GLq(k) P ((P q ) * n ) is isomorphic as an k-vector space to (Q ⊗q n ) GLq(k) , the subspace of GL q (k)-invariants of Q ⊗q . The Singer transfer has been studying for a long time: see Boardman [4], Chơn and Hà [9], Crossley [10], Hà [15], Hưng [18], Hưng-Quỳnh [19], Minami [26], the present writer [31,33,34,35,36,37], Sum [44,46], and others. By the works of Singer himself [39] and Boardman [4], T r A q is known to be an isomorphism for q ≤ 3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%