2012
DOI: 10.1515/ans-2012-0105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Diffeomorphisms Between Banach and Hilbert Spaces

Abstract: In this paper, we give some sufficient conditions for f : X → H to be a diffeomorphism, where X is a Banach space and H is a Hilbert space. The proof of the result is based on the mountain pass theorem. Using this result, in the final part of the paper, we prove an existence theorem for some class of integro-differential equations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
59
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results extends their counterparts from [7] where the case p = 2 is considered, i.e. diffeomorphism between two Hilbert spaces works.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our results extends their counterparts from [7] where the case p = 2 is considered, i.e. diffeomorphism between two Hilbert spaces works.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…diffeomorphism between two Hilbert spaces works. Thus while we use similar general ideas several key details have to be considered in the other way due to the fact that now we do not have a Hilbert space structure which is extensively exploited in [7]. Concerning the abstract tool applied in [7] it is now modified accordingly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The problem of the smooth dependence of solutions on the parameter of integral or integro-differential equations was discussed in papers [2,6,7,9,10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The novelty of this paper, in contrast to papers [9,10] is, among others, the application of the Bielecki norm in the space of solutions which allows us to weaken one of the assumptions (see Remark 2.3 for details).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%