2019
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7171-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the different forms of the kinematical constraint in BFKL

Abstract: We perform a detailed analysis of the different forms of the kinematical constraint imposed on the low x evolution that appear in the literature. We find that all of them generate the same leading anti-collinear poles in Mellin space which agree with BFKL up to NLL order and up to NNLL in N = 4 sYM. The coefficients of subleading poles vanish up to NNLL order for all constraints and we prove that this property should be satisfied to all orders. We then demonstrate that the kinematical constraints differ at fur… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Regge limit z n 1 one can put t −q 2 T 1 , but the latter approximation quickly degrades with an JHEP08(2020)055 increase of z n . In the kinematic constraint approach [52,53] to approximately take into account large collinearly-enhanced corrections to BFKL-evolution, one cuts-off the region of real-emission phase-space, where t −q 2 T 1 -approximation is no longer valid, i.e. one rejects the emissions with:…”
Section: Jhep08(2020)055mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Regge limit z n 1 one can put t −q 2 T 1 , but the latter approximation quickly degrades with an JHEP08(2020)055 increase of z n . In the kinematic constraint approach [52,53] to approximately take into account large collinearly-enhanced corrections to BFKL-evolution, one cuts-off the region of real-emission phase-space, where t −q 2 T 1 -approximation is no longer valid, i.e. one rejects the emissions with:…”
Section: Jhep08(2020)055mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which is the NLL term due to the scale changing transformation. At NNLL the scale changing transformation is much more complicated as it involves the NLL kernel as well [61,62]. Coming back to the NLL kernel, the well known problem that arises at NLL order in BFKL is due to the presence of double and triple collinear logarithms.…”
Section: Ll and Nll Bfkl Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also triple collinear poles which appear due to the kinematical constraints [28,29]. Such constraints were discussed in the BFKL context as originating from the improved kinematics, and more precisely by the requirement that the exchanged momenta are dominated by the transverse components [21,22], for more recent work on different forms of kinematical constraint see [62]. These contributions generate the double transverse logarithms and in the Mellin space they exhibit most singular behavior, the triple collinear poles…”
Section: Ll and Nll Bfkl Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such an implementation makes direct introduction of effects beyond the leading logarithmic approximation possible, e.g. conservation of energy and momentum without imposing kinematical constraints on the splitting kernel [34]. This makes the implementation attractive for estimation of basic quantities dominated by small x processes (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%