2016
DOI: 10.1109/tsipn.2016.2596439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Difficulty of Selecting Ising Models with Approximate Recovery

Abstract: Abstract-In this paper, we consider the problem of estimating the underlying graph associated with an Ising model given a number of independent and identically distributed samples. We adopt an approximate recovery criterion that allows for a number of missed edges or incorrectly-included edges, in contrast with the widely-studied exact recovery problem. Our main results provide information-theoretic lower bounds on the sample complexity for graph classes imposing constraints on the number of edges, maximal deg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, the present paper is a significant extension and generalization of this perspective. Our bounds further improve the approximate recovery lower bounds of [SC16].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…As such, the present paper is a significant extension and generalization of this perspective. Our bounds further improve the approximate recovery lower bounds of [SC16].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The bounded correlation property P2 then implies that atanh(ρ min ) ≤ |θ i,j | ≤ atanh(ρ max ). Note that although property P1 is a common assumption that simplifies the presentation (Tandon et al, 2014;Scarlett & Cevher, 2016;Nikolakakis et al, 2019a;Bresler & Karzand, 2020), the extension of our results to the case where the marginals are not necessarily uniform can be readily obtained by following the approach outlined by Katiyar et al (2020).…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Properties P1 and P2 are common assumptions in the literature on learning Ising models (Tandon et al, 2014;Scarlett & Cevher, 2016;Nikolakakis et al, 2019a;Bresler & Karzand, 2020), while P3 ensures that no node is independent of any other node due to noise (Katiyar et al, 2020). For an Ising model with zero external field, the joint distribution given by (1) can be expressed as (Bresler & Karzand, 2020)…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Structure learning of the edge set in the Ising model is a well-studied problem in the statistics literature. Considerable attention has been given to finding theoretic information bounds for learning Ising graph structures (Scarlett and Cevher, 2016;Tandon et al, 2014;Santhanam and Wainwright, 2012). Table 1 in Scarlett and Cevher (2016) gives a useful summary of the graphical assumptions for which these information theoretic bounds are known.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%