2003
DOI: 10.1029/2003gl017760
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the diffusivity in coastline dynamics

Abstract: [1] The 1D diffusion equation for the dynamics of the coastline is revisited. It is found that the classical evaluation of the diffusivity coefficient over-predicts it by a factor ranging from 1.25 up to infinity since the diffusivity may become zero while the classical prediction is always positive. The over-prediction depends on wave steepness and wave incidence angle. It is larger for swell than for sea waves and it increases with increasing angle. For moderate angles it can easily be about a factor 10. Neg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
55
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
5
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The diffusivity is positive provided that the angle between wave fronts and the coastline at breaking is smaller than 45-. Since this is typically the case because of the refraction of the waves as they approach the coast, the diffusivity in this model is always positive (Falqués, 2003;Falqués and Calvete, 2005). This has the important implication that the rectilinear coastline is stable, any perturbation tending to diffuse away.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The diffusivity is positive provided that the angle between wave fronts and the coastline at breaking is smaller than 45-. Since this is typically the case because of the refraction of the waves as they approach the coast, the diffusivity in this model is always positive (Falqués, 2003;Falqués and Calvete, 2005). This has the important implication that the rectilinear coastline is stable, any perturbation tending to diffuse away.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…As a consequence, the correct formulation for shoreline evolution includes a diffusivity that changes magnitude and sign as wave angle changes Murray, 2006a, 2006b;Ashton et al, 2001;Falqués, 2003]. This shoreline diffusivity is positive when wave angles are smaller than the maximum in alongshore sediment transport (tending to smooth the coast) and negative for larger angles (meaning a straight shoreline configuration would be unstable) (Figure 2a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, changes in shoreline shape that occur on time scales shorter than the characteristic time for the whole shoreface to respond will not necessarily be reflected in the contours on the deeper portions of the shoreface. To address the evolution of shoreline features on these smaller time and space scales, wave transformation over contours that do not reflect the shoreline shapes of interest needs to be considered [5,6,28]. For example, the smaller the alongshore scales of a coastline undulation, and the shallower the undulations affecting the seabed (and the longer the wave period), the greater the dominance of high-angle waves at the offshore extent of the shoreface needs to be to cause the high-angle coastline instability [7,11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%