Abstract:Let 2 ≤ p < 100 be a rational prime and consider equation (3) in the title in integer unknowns x, y, n, k with x > 0, y > 1, n ≥ 3 prime, k ≥ 0 and gcd(x, y) = 1. Under the above conditions we give all solutions of the title equation (see the Theorem). We note that if in (3) gcd(x, y) = 1, our Theorem is an extension of several earlier results [15], [
“…Partial results on the case when S = {7} appear in [23]. Recently, Bérczes and Pink [8], found all the solutions of the Diophantine equation (1.1) when C = p k and k is even, where p is any prime in the interval [2,100].…”
In this note, we find all the solutions of the Diophantine equation x 2 + 2a · 3b · 11c = y n, in nonnegative integers a, b, c, x, y, n ≥ 3 with x and y coprime.
“…Partial results on the case when S = {7} appear in [23]. Recently, Bérczes and Pink [8], found all the solutions of the Diophantine equation (1.1) when C = p k and k is even, where p is any prime in the interval [2,100].…”
In this note, we find all the solutions of the Diophantine equation x 2 + 2a · 3b · 11c = y n, in nonnegative integers a, b, c, x, y, n ≥ 3 with x and y coprime.
“…In the course of the proof of our main result we have to solve completely several equations of the shape (6) x b + t = y n , where x, t are given odd positive integers and b, y, n are unknown positive integers with y ≥ 2 even and n ≥ 3 an odd prime. By using Lemma 3.2 and Lemma 3.1 we derive relatively sharp explicit upper bounds for n in equation (6).…”
Section: Some Lemmasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, in what follows, we may write b occurring in (6) in the form b = nB + r, where B and r are integers for which B ≥ 0 and 0 < r ≤ n − 1. Thus, equation (6) yields…”
Section: Some Lemmasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, a s are unknown positive integers. For related results we only refer to the papers of Schinzel and Tijdeman [21], Cohn [12], Bugeaud, Mignotte and Siksek [10], Luca [18], Bugeaud and Muriefah [11], Bérczes and Pink [6], Le and Zhu [16] and Xiaowei [23], and the references given there.…”
Abstract. Recently, mixed polynomial-exponential equations similar to the one in the title have been considered by many authors. In these results a certain non-coprimality condition plays an important role.In this paper we completely solve the title equation for odd positive integers x with x < 50. Since we avoid the mentioned non-coprimality condition, this can be considered as a partial completion of the above mentioned results.It seems that the deep effective tools (such as Baker's method) alone are not capable to handle the problem. We combine local arguments and Baker's method to prove our results.
IntroductionMixed polynomial-exponential equations are of classical and recent interest. One of the most famous equation of this type is the so-called Ramanujan-Nagell equation
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.