2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2006.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the discounted penalty function in the renewal risk model with general interclaim times

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(11 reference statements)
1
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This function is known to satisfy a defective renewal equation (Gerber and Shiu 1998;Lin and Garrido 2004;Willmot 2007) but easy explicit formulae for φ (u) are only available for certain special cases for the claim size distribution Willmot 1999, 2000;Landriault and Willmot 2008). Let w(x, y) = 1; we then obtain the expression for the defective Laplace transform (LT) of the time of ruin φ (u) = E e −δ T I (T < ∞) |R (0) = u , and if in addition δ = 0, then φ (u) = P [T < ∞|R (0) = u] = ψ (u), i.e.…”
Section: Assumptions and Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This function is known to satisfy a defective renewal equation (Gerber and Shiu 1998;Lin and Garrido 2004;Willmot 2007) but easy explicit formulae for φ (u) are only available for certain special cases for the claim size distribution Willmot 1999, 2000;Landriault and Willmot 2008). Let w(x, y) = 1; we then obtain the expression for the defective Laplace transform (LT) of the time of ruin φ (u) = E e −δ T I (T < ∞) |R (0) = u , and if in addition δ = 0, then φ (u) = P [T < ∞|R (0) = u] = ψ (u), i.e.…”
Section: Assumptions and Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 have been used independently by Willmot (2007), Vlasiou (2007) and Lefévre (2007). In fact, in the renewal model of risk theory, Willmot (2007), see also Landriault and Willmot (2008), used a similar factorization as Eq. 3 for the tail of claim size distribution and studied some analytical expressions for the Gerber-Shiu discounted penalty function.…”
Section: Preliminaries and Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3, then following the ideas as in [35,37,49], for δ 2 > 0, L δ 2 ,X (·) is seen to be a linear combination of exponential terms. Hence, all quantities on the right-hand side of (4.6) can be explicitly evaluated, and the choice of penalty function w * (·) is also a linear combination of exponential terms.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%