1974
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9045(74)90037-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the discrete linear L1 approximation and L1 solutions of overdetermined linear equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

1975
1975
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6 Both share the reconstruction using the l1 minimization for solving the under determined linear system. 7 Compression and reconstruction can be separated operations without sharing the same matrix or even the same compression-reconstruction algorithm. To achieve this, suitable orthogonal base functions must be known as a priori knowledge.…”
Section: Fragmented L1-norm Transformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Both share the reconstruction using the l1 minimization for solving the under determined linear system. 7 Compression and reconstruction can be separated operations without sharing the same matrix or even the same compression-reconstruction algorithm. To achieve this, suitable orthogonal base functions must be known as a priori knowledge.…”
Section: Fragmented L1-norm Transformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [1], a dual simplex algorithm for solving problem (4) is given, where no artificial variables are used. It was also shown that the algorithm in [1] is completely equivalent to a modified version of a method due to Usow [9] for solving the discrete linear L. approximation problem. Except that one iteration in the latter is equivalent to one or more iterations in the former.…”
Section: =1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) and (2) was demonstrated by Chames, Cooper and Ferguson [8], it has generally been agreed that linear programming is computationally the most efficient method for obtaining an optimal a value. Wagner [15] showed that the linear programming dual of (2) can be solved with simple upper bounding techniques which requires a working basis of size m by m. This would be as opposed to the « by « basis if (1) were to be solved with a standard primal simplex algorithm. Generally, m is substantially less than « and, thus, Wagner's approach was considered the most efficient for some time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abdelmalek [2] also presents a special purpose linear programming algorithm to solve (1). He employs a transformation on the dual of (2) and solves it with a modification of the dual simplex algorithm for bounded variables [14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%