2019
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the dissection of degenerate cosmologies with machine learning

Abstract: Based on the DUSTGRAIN-pathfinder suite of simulations, we investigate observational degeneracies between nine models of modified gravity and massive neutrinos. Three types of machine learning techniques are tested for their ability to discriminate lensing convergence maps by extracting dimensional reduced representations of the data. Classical map descriptors such as the power spectrum, peak counts and Minkowski functionals are combined into a joint feature vector and compared to the descriptors and statistic… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The DES Collaboration considers neutrino mass and extensions to GR in the same analysis [36], although they only state the resulting constraints on the MG parameters and not the neutrino masses. There are some promising signs that certain observables may be better at reducing or even breaking this degeneracy, such as higher-order weak lensing statistics [37] and weak lensing tomographic information at multiple redshifts [38]; as well as techniques that are superior at distinguishing models such as machine learning [39,40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DES Collaboration considers neutrino mass and extensions to GR in the same analysis [36], although they only state the resulting constraints on the MG parameters and not the neutrino masses. There are some promising signs that certain observables may be better at reducing or even breaking this degeneracy, such as higher-order weak lensing statistics [37] and weak lensing tomographic information at multiple redshifts [38]; as well as techniques that are superior at distinguishing models such as machine learning [39,40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning provides a tool that is well suited to modelling cosmological structure formation, given its ability to learn non-linear relationships. In fact, machine learning tools have already proved useful in the context of structure formation in, for example, distinguishing between cosmological models (Merten et al 2019) or constructing mock dark matter halo catalogues (Berger & Stein 2019). However, understanding the inner workings of machine learning models remains a challenge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now that the validity of the analytic model of the field cluster mass function for the f (R) gravity cosmology is confirmed, we repeat the whole process but for the fR4+0.3 eV, fR5+0.15 eV and fR6+0.06 eV cosmologies, which were shown to be degenerate with the GR in the standard statistics including the nonlinear density power spectrum, cluster mass functions and halo bias (Baldi et al 2014;Giocoli et al 2019). Figure 10 (Figure 11) depicts the same as Figure 1 (Figure 2) but for the fR4+0.3 eV, fR5+0.15 eV and fR6+0.06 eV cosmologies.…”
Section: Combined Effect Of F (R)+ν On β(Z)mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Collapsed structures were identified through a FoF finder with a linking length parameter of l c = 0.16 followed by the unbinding procedure implemented in the SUBFIND code to identify the halo center and its spherical overdensity mass and radius for all gravitationally bound objects in each cosmology, similarly to what described above for the CoDECS simulations. For a detailed description of the technical details of the DUSTGRAIN-pathfinder simulations, see Giocoli et al (2019).…”
Section: Effect Of F (R) Gravity On β(Z)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation