“…To prove Theorem 1 we need a good separation result on the α i 's themselves. Before presenting our result on the root separation of f k (X), with which we will prove Theorem 1, we will show how we can obtain a better result than the one proved by Dubickas [2] in our particular case by using results of Mahler [5] and Mignotte [6]. Namely, let us show that the inequality…”
Section: An Auxiliar Separation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The above Theorem 1 is a separation result concerning the absolute values of the differences of the roots of f k (X). Quite general separation results of this kind appear in [2] but they are much worse (the denominator of the analogous expression from the right-hand side in (2) in [2] is exponential in k 2 ). To prove Theorem 1 we need a good separation result on the α i 's themselves.…”
Section: An Auxiliar Separation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and Dubickas [2] improved the right-hand side above to 1 + 1.454 −k 3 . Our first result is improving this bound.…”
“…To prove Theorem 1 we need a good separation result on the α i 's themselves. Before presenting our result on the root separation of f k (X), with which we will prove Theorem 1, we will show how we can obtain a better result than the one proved by Dubickas [2] in our particular case by using results of Mahler [5] and Mignotte [6]. Namely, let us show that the inequality…”
Section: An Auxiliar Separation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The above Theorem 1 is a separation result concerning the absolute values of the differences of the roots of f k (X). Quite general separation results of this kind appear in [2] but they are much worse (the denominator of the analogous expression from the right-hand side in (2) in [2] is exponential in k 2 ). To prove Theorem 1 we need a good separation result on the α i 's themselves.…”
Section: An Auxiliar Separation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and Dubickas [2] improved the right-hand side above to 1 + 1.454 −k 3 . Our first result is improving this bound.…”
In this paper, we prove identities for members of the k-generalized Fibonacci sequence with negative indices and we apply these identities to deduce an exact formula for its zero-multiplicity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.