2009
DOI: 10.1353/lan.0.0136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the distinction between regular and irregular inflectional morphology: Evidence from Dinka

Abstract: Discussions of the psycholinguistic significance of regularity in inflectional morphology generally deal with languages in which regular forms can be clearly identified and revolve around whether there are distinct processing mechanisms for regular and irregular forms. We present a detailed description of Dinka's notoriously irregular noun number inflection and suggest that no pattern can usefully be designated as regular. Psycholinguistic studies of Dinka would make a valuable contribution to our understandin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Frank (1999) describes around sixty distinct operations. This is clearly a manifestation of the same kind of system that Ladd, Remijsen, and Manyang (2009) describe for Dinka, a Western Nilotic language closely related to Nuer. They identify eighty-three distinct operations, which, they observe, 'make it appear entirely possible for a rich inflectional system not to have any patterns that can be identified as regular at all' (Ladd et al 2009:659).…”
mentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Frank (1999) describes around sixty distinct operations. This is clearly a manifestation of the same kind of system that Ladd, Remijsen, and Manyang (2009) describe for Dinka, a Western Nilotic language closely related to Nuer. They identify eighty-three distinct operations, which, they observe, 'make it appear entirely possible for a rich inflectional system not to have any patterns that can be identified as regular at all' (Ladd et al 2009:659).…”
mentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Pinker & Ullman, 2002 vs McClelland & Patterson, 2002); however, the relative simplicity of this system, including the dichotomy of regular versus irregular verb forms (Herce, 2019), raises issues relating to representativeness of languages more widely. Morphology in other systems such as Finnish verbs (Räsänen et al, 2016), Jordanian Arabic nouns (Albirini, 2015), Lithuanian nouns (Savičiūtė et al, 2018) and Dinka numerals (Ladd et al, 2009) can be considerably more complex, idiosyncratic and unpredictable than English inflection – yet children come to acquire them. A relatively recent trend in the inflectional acquisition literature is the testing of constructivist-based hypotheses for highly inflected language systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, literature on Dinka tends to focus on single dialects (e.g. Andersen 1993;Storch 2005;Ladd et al 2009). Dinka dialects can differ, sometimes considerably, in their morphosyntax.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%