2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.02.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the distortional-global interaction in cold-formed steel columns: Relevance, post-buckling behaviour, strength and DSM design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first two are used in this investigation, but it should be noted that the currently codified MND is replaced by the strength curves proposed in [9], which were found to yield much more accurate failure moment predictions. The same approach adopted for columns affected by D-G interaction [11] is followed in this work, leading to two strength curves for D-G interactive failures: (i) the NDG approach (MNDG), involving the replacement of My by MNG, and (ii) the NGD approach (MNGD), where My is replaced by MND  both approaches include the additional elastic-plastic strength reserve prescribed by the current North-American specification [10]. The NDG approach, which was found to yield better quality failure moment predictions, reads   , 0.673…”
Section: Direct Strength Methods (Dsm) Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first two are used in this investigation, but it should be noted that the currently codified MND is replaced by the strength curves proposed in [9], which were found to yield much more accurate failure moment predictions. The same approach adopted for columns affected by D-G interaction [11] is followed in this work, leading to two strength curves for D-G interactive failures: (i) the NDG approach (MNDG), involving the replacement of My by MNG, and (ii) the NGD approach (MNGD), where My is replaced by MND  both approaches include the additional elastic-plastic strength reserve prescribed by the current North-American specification [10]. The NDG approach, which was found to yield better quality failure moment predictions, reads   , 0.673…”
Section: Direct Strength Methods (Dsm) Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is considerably less research activity devoted to columns prone to D-G interaction than to the coupling phenomena addressed before. Indeed, the existing studies addressing this type of interaction, relevant in intermediateto-long columns, consist of i) experimental investigations on rack-section uprights with and without holes [25,26], lipped channel columns [13] (originally intended to investigate L-D-G interaction) and web-stiffened lipped channel columns [27], and ii) SFE numerical investigations on simply supported and fixed-ended lipped channel columns [28,29], simply supported and warping-prevented racksection uprights with or without holes [30] and fixed-ended lipped channel, web-stiffened lipped channel and zedsection columns [31]. It is also worth noting i) a GBTbased numerical study on the D-G interactive mechanics in fixed-ended C and Z columns [32], and ii) an investigation involving cold-formed stainless steel lipped channel columns [33,34].…”
Section: Distortional-global Interaction In Columnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DSM design considerations concerning CFS columns failing in D-G interactive modes addressed here are due to Martins et al [31] and almost exclusively based on numerical failure load data acquired by these authors through parametric studies involving singly symmetric (C and WSLC -web-stiffened lipped channels) and pointsymmetric (Z) columns. The columns analysed exhibit a wide range of critical global-to-distortional buckling load ratios R GD (varying from 0.5 to 2.0), which means that all the three types of D-G interaction (True, SGB and SDB) were dealt with -naturally, D-FT interaction occurs in C and WSLC columns, while Z columns undergo D-F interaction.…”
Section: Dsm Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1(a1)-(c1) are now studied, in order to shed fresh light on the mechanics of D-G interaction, taking full advantage of the GBT modal nature. It is well known that distinct IGI may cause, to a smaller or larger extent, different qualitative postbuckling behaviours and, in some cases, may also lead to coupling phenomena of distinct natures (still unfamiliar to the technical community [5,6]). Therefore, the consideration of different IGI shapes is crucial in mode interaction investigations.…”
Section: True D-g Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%