2007
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1027629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Distribution of Penalized Maximum Likelihood Estimators: The LASSO, SCAD, and Thresholding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…18 To answer this question, we consider 5 estimators of the SCAD and MCP with a = 2 k for k = 1, . .…”
Section: Comparison With the Scad And Mcp For Large A 17mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…18 To answer this question, we consider 5 estimators of the SCAD and MCP with a = 2 k for k = 1, . .…”
Section: Comparison With the Scad And Mcp For Large A 17mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LASSO has 17 the smallest PE but the largest MS for all cases. The SCAD and MCP perform better in terms of PE but have larger MS as a 18 increases, while the SCAD has larger MS than the MCP for the same a. Among 5 MCLs, the MCL with γ =γ selects much 19 smaller variables, even though it has slightly larger PE than the LASSO.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…But a recent paper by Kyung et al (2009) shows that if a true variable is zero then bootstrap estimation of that variable is not consistent. More broadly, only calculating the standard errors may be inadequate for describing the true uncertainty of the LASSO estimator since Pötscher and Leeb (2007) show the distribution of the LASSO estimator is a mixture of two truncated normal densities. Of course, it still gives a general sense of the variability of the estimator; perhaps just as important, we will see that it can be used to differentiate the good estimators from the bad ones in most cases.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Fitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally we can resize vec(P A ) and vec(P A ) to M × N matrices and plot them as images. We should note that this is a point-wise standard deviation-simultaneous standard deviation surfaces are difficult to obtain since the distribution of u is complex (Pötscher and Leeb 2007).…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Fitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as proved by Zhao and Yu (2006), the crude lasso is not model-consistent unless some cumbersome conditions on the design matrix. Moreover, Zou and Hastie (2005) showed that it can be sensitive to highly correlated predictors and Pötscher and Leeb (2009) warned that its distributional properties can be surprisingly complex. A large number of proposals have been made to enhance the lasso as a selection operator.…”
Section: Penalized Likelihoodmentioning
confidence: 99%