2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.quageo.2013.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the dose dependency of the bleachable and non-bleachable components of IRSL from K-feldspar: Improved procedures for luminescence dating of Quaternary sediments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This implies that the easy-to-bleach signal component has been removed and the determined D e -values are likely representing likely the effect of slow-to-bleach components and/or thermal transfer. Similar observations have been made by Li et al (2013), who observed an increase of residuals with increasing stimulation temperature and emphasise that the residual dose associated with the nonbleachable component is highly variable from sample to sample. The results presented here confirm the first observation and further highlight that even for sediments that are usually considered as well-bleached, such as the aeolian sand derived from beach deposits of our study, the residual might be important, at least for high temperature approaches.…”
Section: Fig 4 Comparison Of Residual Doses For Different Methods Asupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This implies that the easy-to-bleach signal component has been removed and the determined D e -values are likely representing likely the effect of slow-to-bleach components and/or thermal transfer. Similar observations have been made by Li et al (2013), who observed an increase of residuals with increasing stimulation temperature and emphasise that the residual dose associated with the nonbleachable component is highly variable from sample to sample. The results presented here confirm the first observation and further highlight that even for sediments that are usually considered as well-bleached, such as the aeolian sand derived from beach deposits of our study, the residual might be important, at least for high temperature approaches.…”
Section: Fig 4 Comparison Of Residual Doses For Different Methods Asupporting
confidence: 87%
“…It has previously been reported that MET-pIRIR signals obtained at elevated temperatures (>200 C) show negligible rates of anomalous fading and, hence, require no fading correction, and that the corresponding MET-pIRIR ages are consistent with independent or quartz OSL ages for various sedimentary samples from China deposited in the last~300 ka Li, 2011, 2012). In an earlier study, however, we reported that the K-feldspars extracted from samples collected from Les Cott es exhibit a large proportion (~30%) of non-bleachable or residual signal in their MET-pIRIR signals, even after a prolonged sunlight bleach lasting several days (Li et al, 2013). We also demonstrated that the residual signal is strongly dose dependent, which may lead to large uncertainty in D e estimation (Li et al, 2013).…”
Section: Multiple-aliquot Met-pirir Results and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…In an earlier study, however, we reported that the K-feldspars extracted from samples collected from Les Cott es exhibit a large proportion (~30%) of non-bleachable or residual signal in their MET-pIRIR signals, even after a prolonged sunlight bleach lasting several days (Li et al, 2013). We also demonstrated that the residual signal is strongly dose dependent, which may lead to large uncertainty in D e estimation (Li et al, 2013). To overcome this problem in this study, we used a multiple-aliquot method to avoid having to make the residual dose correction (Table S3).…”
Section: Multiple-aliquot Met-pirir Results and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations