2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2007.07.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the dynamical ferromagnetic, quantum Hall, and relativistic effects on the carbon nanotubes nucleation and growth mechanism

Abstract: The mechanism of carbon nanotube (CNT) nucleation and growth has been under investigation for 15 years, since the discovery of this most explored material of the 20th century. Prior models have attempted the extension of classical transport mechanisms used to explain the older, bigger, micron-sized filamentous carbon formations. In July 2000, a more thorough, detailed, nonclassical, and relativistic mechanism was formulated considering the detailed dynamics of the electronics of relativistic spin and rehybridi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of the electromagnetic RF fields, of a 350 kHz frequency, is believed to be responsible for a better catalytic conversion of the carbon atoms into graphitic structures, with an enhanced quality and efficiency. We have previously seen differences in the morphological properties of the nanotubes, such as diameter and crystallinity, when synthesized in a conventional thermal furnace or in the RF generator. , Nonetheless, it is important to affirm that the catalytic conversion occurs under different heating methods (inductive or resistive thermal heating). We are currently investigating this phenomenon to further understand the growth mechanism of CNTs in the electrical furnace and the RF generator.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of the electromagnetic RF fields, of a 350 kHz frequency, is believed to be responsible for a better catalytic conversion of the carbon atoms into graphitic structures, with an enhanced quality and efficiency. We have previously seen differences in the morphological properties of the nanotubes, such as diameter and crystallinity, when synthesized in a conventional thermal furnace or in the RF generator. , Nonetheless, it is important to affirm that the catalytic conversion occurs under different heating methods (inductive or resistive thermal heating). We are currently investigating this phenomenon to further understand the growth mechanism of CNTs in the electrical furnace and the RF generator.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carbon nanotubes were synthesized over the Fe-Co/MgO catalyst using the RF-CCVD method 19 and methane as the carbon sources. The RF inductive heating was performed using a RF generator operated at radio frequency of 365 kHz.…”
Section: Synthesis Of Cntsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The UV-Vis-NIR results were therefore in excellent agreement with the Raman and TEM analysis results. 130CNTs exhibited peaks dominating in the 1000 nm wavelength region corresponding to larger diameter single wall carbon nanotubes (from 1.6-1.7 nm), such as (19,3) in the second van Hove transition wavelength 1033 nm and (14, 10) at the 1078 nm wavelength. Additionally, there were observed smaller diameter CNTs (0.75 nm), such as (6, 5) and (9, 1) nanotubes which correspond to S11 at wavelength of 984 nm and 923 nm.…”
Section: Uv-vis-nir and Photoluminescence Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For both types of nanoparticles, although at different rates, the localized RF heating provided by the nanoparticles is believed to be responsible for the cell accelerated apoptotic process and consequently cellular decomposition. The RF electromagnetic radiation is believed to induce skin currents (heat) especially into the C-Co-NPs and increases their temperature due to Ohmic effects [23,24]. For the medium solution the temperature was found to remain almost constant (from room temperature to 25 °C) with increasing the concentration of C-Co-NPs.…”
Section: G Dna Fragmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%