2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.aop.2006.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the dynamical mass generation in confining Yang–Mills theories

Abstract: The dynamical mass generation for gluons is discussed in Euclidean Yang-Mills theories supplemented with a renormalizable mass term. The mass parameter is not free, being determined in a self-consistent way through a gap equation which obeys the renormalization group. The example of the Landau gauge is worked out explicitly at one loop order. A few remarks on the issue of the unitarity are provided. * sorella@uerj.br * From now on we shall consider pure Yang-Mills theory in the Euclidean space-time.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From Q max to ∞, R e + e − remained constant, and in this region we can make the integration of Eq. (19) analytically. The quite narrow resonances are given by Eq.…”
Section: Hadronic Cross Section R E + E − (S)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From Q max to ∞, R e + e − remained constant, and in this region we can make the integration of Eq. (19) analytically. The quite narrow resonances are given by Eq.…”
Section: Hadronic Cross Section R E + E − (S)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[35]. We wish to consider the former since it has been related to a possible effective gluon mass [36][37][38] that has been seemingly found in several other analytical calculations [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46] and in numerical and lattice calculations [37,38,[47][48][49][50][51]. Our departing point therefore is the NJL of Ref.…”
Section: Introduction and Extended Nambu-jona-lasinio Model From Qcdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This should be done by some kind of consistent gap equation, as m is not supposed to be a free parameter of the theory, see also [3,4,22]. This is however beyond the scope of the present paper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%