1953
DOI: 10.1177/001872675300600101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Dynamics of Social Structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

1959
1959
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The psychoanalytic approach to studying organizations has a long and varied history, beginning with Freud's own social theorizing (Freud, 1913;1921;1927;1930) and continuing with the seminal contributions of members of the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations (Jacques, 1953;Trist and Sofer, 1959;Menzies Lyth, 1960;Bion, 1961). Now in its third generation of scholars and practitioners, the Tavistock Institute continues to advance scholarship in organization theory and behavior (e.g., Aram and Baxter, 2009), as do the closely related organizations of The A. K. Rice Institute (ARKI), and the International Society for the Psychoanalytic Study of Organizations (ISPSO) (e.g., Sievers, 2009).…”
Section: Understanding Organizations Psychoanalyticallymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The psychoanalytic approach to studying organizations has a long and varied history, beginning with Freud's own social theorizing (Freud, 1913;1921;1927;1930) and continuing with the seminal contributions of members of the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations (Jacques, 1953;Trist and Sofer, 1959;Menzies Lyth, 1960;Bion, 1961). Now in its third generation of scholars and practitioners, the Tavistock Institute continues to advance scholarship in organization theory and behavior (e.g., Aram and Baxter, 2009), as do the closely related organizations of The A. K. Rice Institute (ARKI), and the International Society for the Psychoanalytic Study of Organizations (ISPSO) (e.g., Sievers, 2009).…”
Section: Understanding Organizations Psychoanalyticallymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Awareness of its limitations and justifications for mobilizing a psychology of the individual to understand groups, abound (Armstrong, 2005;Bion, 1952;Behr and Hearst, 2005;Foulkes, 1965;Frosh, 2010), as do attempts to adapt depth psychological concepts to elucidate the psychological processes of specific groups (Hinshelwood, 1997;Jacques, 1953;Skynner, 1991). Most authors engaged in this interdisciplinary endeavour recognize that they may be encroaching upon other disciplines -among them sociology, anthropology and history -the raison d'être of which is to understand collectives.…”
Section: Conflating Different Levels Of Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I will look at the role of public institutions as containers of unwanted and/or inadmissible societal anxieties and the defensive behaviour this function gives rise to on the organizational level. To this effect, I will also critically apply the psychoanalytic approaches to institutionally sanctioned defences against anxiety generated by the work task, which were first recognized by Jacques (1953) and Menzies (1960) as deep-seated barriers to change what Bain (1998) termed as 'system domain'. Finally, I will explore individual-level patient-doctor/nurse relationships using concepts of transference and counter-transference (Balint, 1957), and the Kleinian elaborations on regression to primary dependency (Klein, 1952) and envy (Klein, 1957).…”
Section: Psychoanalytic Framework Of Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In her object relation theory, Klein (1952) expanded on splitting and denial mechanisms in relation to individual mental functions, and others have applied this theory to understanding group dynamics (Jacques, 1953;Bion, 1961;Hinshelwood, 1987). According to Bion (1961), unconscious individual anxieties of annihilation of the self and/or the loved object are at the root of group dynamics and recurrent irrational behaviours by group members.…”
Section: Organizational Level -Socially Sanctioned Defences Against Amentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation