2000
DOI: 10.5670/oceanog.2000.20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Dynamics of Subaqueous Debris Flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These types of flows are better described by frictional flow models. 5,7,8 Following the description of the rheological regimes as found in Ref. 2, the Bingham rheology yields…”
Section: A Rheological Regimes For the Description Of Submarine Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These types of flows are better described by frictional flow models. 5,7,8 Following the description of the rheological regimes as found in Ref. 2, the Bingham rheology yields…”
Section: A Rheological Regimes For the Description Of Submarine Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different styles of deformation provide insight into process, material strength and rheology, basin orientation, and failure conditions (Figure 17;Dott, 1963;Fisher, 1983;Stow, 1986;Elverhoi et al, 2000;Eyles and Eyles, 2000;Strachan, 2002;De Blasio et al, 2006;Moscardelli and Wood, 2008;Tripsanas et al, 2008;Haughton et al, 2009;Mazzanti and De Blasio, 2010;Talling et al, 2012;Auchter et al, 2016;Jablonska et al, 2018). Styles of intrastratal deformation range from creep to slide to slump to debris flow, but often deposits reflect a continuum between these styles (Figure 17; Dott, 1963;Nemec, 1990;Strachan, 2002;Tripsanas et al, 2008;Haughton et al, 2009;Talling et al, 2012).…”
Section: Deformation Style and Charactermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Creep deposits (sensu Auchter et al, 2016) are observed at many scales on the outcrop (Figure 17A, Figure 16A1, A2, Figure 15A) and are composed primarily of carbonate mudstone facies (F1, F2, F3) that have preserved strata and plastic deformation (folds, boudinage) and little to no brittle failure (Figure 17A, Dott, 1963;Stow, 1986;Moscardelli and Wood, 2008;Auchter et al, 2016). A macro-scale example of creep is documented from Bone Canyon south (Figure 15A), where deformed beds reach dips of 40° with minimal intra-bed disturbance, indicating high strength and coherency of the failing rock material (Dott, 1963;Stow, 1986;Elverhoi et al, 2000;Tripsanas et al, 2008;Talling et al, 2012). The prevalence of multi-scale creep within the carbonate slope facies (Figure 16A1, A2) suggest that the Bone Spring slope was almost always over-steepened and prone to failure (Stow, 1986).…”
Section: Deformation Style and Charactermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Iverson [64] notes that the recorded bulk densities of debris flows rarely fall outside a range of 1800-2300 kg m −3 . To account for a submerged landslide we use the apparent density of the mixture: ρ = (ρ ls − ρ w ), where ρ ls is the bulk landslide density and ρ w is the water density (see also [20,65]). For the numerical simulations, we use a reduced density, ρ, for the landslide mass where ρ ls ranges between 1800 and 2300 kg m −3 and ρ w = 1000 kg m −3 .…”
Section: Ranges Of the Calibration Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%