2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10479-019-03217-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the economic growth and environmental trade-off: a multi-objective analysis

Abstract: We develop a multicriteria approach, based on a scalarization technique, in order to analyze the trade off between economic growth and environmental outcomes in a framework in which the economy and environment relation is bidirectional. On the one hand, economic growth by stimulating production activities gives rise to emissions of pollutants which deteriorate the environment. On the other hand, the environment affects economic activities since pollution generates a production externality determining how much … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simplest macroeconomic setting to account for intergenerational equity ( [21]; [22]) and spatial links and spillovers ( [6]; [3]) consists of an optimization problem in which the social planner, by considering the evolution of the capital stock K(x, t), tries to determine the optimal level of consumption C(x, t) over time t ∈ [0, T ] and across space x ∈ Ω to maximize the vector-valued social welfare which is composed of two terms. The first term represents the discounted utility stream of the representative individuals located in different venues within the entire spatial economy J 1 = T 0 Ω U (C(x, t))e −ρt dxdt, where the utility function depends on consumption and the discount factor is ρ > 0.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The simplest macroeconomic setting to account for intergenerational equity ( [21]; [22]) and spatial links and spillovers ( [6]; [3]) consists of an optimization problem in which the social planner, by considering the evolution of the capital stock K(x, t), tries to determine the optimal level of consumption C(x, t) over time t ∈ [0, T ] and across space x ∈ Ω to maximize the vector-valued social welfare which is composed of two terms. The first term represents the discounted utility stream of the representative individuals located in different venues within the entire spatial economy J 1 = T 0 Ω U (C(x, t))e −ρt dxdt, where the utility function depends on consumption and the discount factor is ρ > 0.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different approaches to overcome such an issue have been proposed, but probably the most commonly used consists of extending the objective function to include an additional term representing somehow long term sustainablity considerations ( [12]). The introduction of such an additional term in the optimization problem makes it a multiple objective problem in which the society needs to balance two conflicting goals, represented by short term and long term objectives, respectively; such an interpretation of a macroeconomic problem as a multicriteria problem allows to rely upon the operations research methods to analyze macroeconomic issues, bridging somehow these two important but distinct fields of research ( [21]; [22]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a few of researches on districting and dynamic cooperative scheduling problems so far, mainly focusing on the evolutionary algorithm (EA) [31][32][33], co-evolutionary algorithm (CEA) [34], goal programming [35], and the Tabu search algorithm (TSA) [36], which can basically solve the corresponding problems. What is more, there have been some researches on scheduling of agricultural machineries [37][38][39][40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term "trade-off" is widely used in decision-making. It usually refers to a conflict between two criteria [30][31][32]. The notion "value trade-offs" is used by Keeney [33] to express how much the DM is inclined to decrease one criterion to achieve a particular increase in another criterion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%