2014
DOI: 10.1093/ajae/aau088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Economics of Labels: How Their Introduction Affects the Functioning of Markets and the Welfare of All Participants

Abstract: Are labels good or bad for consumers and firms? The answer may seem straightforward since labels improve information, yet economic theory reveals situations where their introduction reduces the welfare of at least some market participants. This essay reviews the theoretical literature on labels in order to identify and explain the main reasons that may cause labeling to produce undesirable side-effects. In contrast to earlier reviews that either concentrate on narrow topics or treat the subject in a more or le… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
122
0
7

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(73 reference statements)
1
122
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…5 Thus, we do not explicitly consider research that has a theoretical focus or examines market level welfare implications. For readers interested in a theoretical examination of CoO the recent papers by Roe et al (2014) and Bonroy and Constantatos (2015) provide excellent summaries. For research on market level impacts and resulting welfare implications for consumers and manufacturers from the introduction of mandatory CoO, Awada and Yiannaka (2012), Baltussen et al (2013), Joseph et al (2014) and USDA (2015) offer informative and insightful analysis.…”
Section: The Economics Of Coomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Thus, we do not explicitly consider research that has a theoretical focus or examines market level welfare implications. For readers interested in a theoretical examination of CoO the recent papers by Roe et al (2014) and Bonroy and Constantatos (2015) provide excellent summaries. For research on market level impacts and resulting welfare implications for consumers and manufacturers from the introduction of mandatory CoO, Awada and Yiannaka (2012), Baltussen et al (2013), Joseph et al (2014) and USDA (2015) offer informative and insightful analysis.…”
Section: The Economics Of Coomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implicit goal of eco-labels is to prompt informed purchasing choices by environmentally responsible consumers (Leire andThidell 2005: 1062). Unfortunately, even though labeling may alleviate asymmetric information, it may not improve social welfare due to the existence of other market imperfections (Bonroy and Constantatos 2015).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They study the impacts of perfect labeling providing full information and imperfect labeling providing partial information on the outcome of the competition. A detailed and updated review about the labeling on credence is referred to [33]. Our paper differs from the above studies on labeling of credence goods in that we focus on firms' own credence system of trust, such as building firms' own traceability system and making advertisements.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%