2001
DOI: 10.1086/318223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Effect of Chaotic Orbits on Dynamical Friction

Abstract: Chaotic orbits su †er signiÐcant changes as a result of small perturbations. One can thus wonder whether the dynamical friction su †ered by a satellite on a regular orbit, and interacting with the stars of a galaxy, will be di †erent if the bulk of the stars of the galaxy are in regular or chaotic orbits. In order to check that idea, we investigated the orbital decay (caused by dynamical friction) of a rigid satellite moving within a larger stellar system (a galaxy) whose potential is nonintegrable. We perform… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The parameter space of such configurations is considerably larger (and the freedom in cluster orbital projections smaller), potentially allowing more solutions to the timing problem. However, previous studies suggest that, while dynamical friction is on average stronger on box orbits than on loop orbits(Capuzzo-Dolcetta & Vicari 2005), triaxiality has no sifnificant overall effect on the strength of dynamical friction (Cora, Vergne & Muzzio 2001;Sachania 2009). This can be understood as cancellation of two opposing effects.…”
Section: Caveatsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The parameter space of such configurations is considerably larger (and the freedom in cluster orbital projections smaller), potentially allowing more solutions to the timing problem. However, previous studies suggest that, while dynamical friction is on average stronger on box orbits than on loop orbits(Capuzzo-Dolcetta & Vicari 2005), triaxiality has no sifnificant overall effect on the strength of dynamical friction (Cora, Vergne & Muzzio 2001;Sachania 2009). This can be understood as cancellation of two opposing effects.…”
Section: Caveatsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The results obtained by means of the perfect ellipsoid model (whose orbital properties have been fully studied by de Zeeuw 1985) constitute a deep analysis of the behaviour of regular orbits in triaxial potentials and give, also, results of astrophysical interest for elliptical galaxies with a central density core. Actually, even if in the cuspy models chaotic (irregular) orbits are in a relevant fraction (Gerhard & Binney 1985;Merritt & Fridman 1996;Merritt & Valluri 1996), some results seem to indicate that their presence does not affect significantly the orbital decay of the satellite (Cora, Vergne & Muzzio 2001). The self-consistent problem of the 'perfect ellipsoid' has been numerically solved by Statler (1987), who found a solution for the entire explored range of axis ratios, suggesting its existence for any axis ratio.…”
Section: The Galactic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The issue of the contrast between "local" and "non-local" effects has been rediscussed (Prugniel & Combes 1992;Maoz 1993;Cora, Muzzio & Vergne 1997), with the confirmation that the description of the friction process in terms of the "homogeneous limit" (Chandrasekhar 1943) should be adequate in the limit of low-mass, relatively compact satellites. A very recent investigation (Cora, Vergne & Muzzio 2001) also suggests that the process depends very little on the regularity or the stochasticity of the stellar orbits in the galaxy, in contrast with some earlier conjectures (Pfenniger 1986). Other interesting problems are the problem of circularization (of the satellite orbit), the relation of the friction effect to the past history of the dynamical event under consideration, and the issue of a direct calculation of the relevant dissipative force from the response of the stellar system to the perturbing satellite (e.g., see Séguin & Dupraz 1994, 1996 see also Colpi 1998;Colpi & Pallavicini 1998;Colpi, Mayer & Governato 1999;Nelson & Tremaine 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%