2020
DOI: 10.1155/2020/6258010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Effect of Estimation Error for the Risk-Adjusted Charts

Abstract: Control charts are a popular statistical process control (SPC) technique for monitoring to detect the unusual variations in different processes. Contrary to the classical charts, control charts have also been modified to include covariates using regression approaches. is study assesses the performance of risk-adjusted control charts under the complexity of estimation error by considering logistic and negative binomial regression models. To be more precise, risk-adjusted Cumulative Sum (CUSUM) and Exponentially… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They were followed by researchers such as Steiner et al, [41][42][43] Alemi and Olivier, 44 Cook et al, 45 Sego et al, 46,47 Cockings et al, 48 Grigg and Spiegelhalter, 49 Steiner and Jones, 50 Cook et al, 51 Chen et al, 52 Szarka and Woodall, 53 Paynabar and Jin, 54 Shojaei and Niaki, 55 Tian et al, 56 Mohammadian et al, 57 Zhang et al, 58 Zhang and Woodall, [59][60][61] and Sparks 62 who developed the risk-adjusted control charts. In recent years, Sachlas et al, 63 Begun et al, 64 Roy et al, 65 Ali et al, 66 Ding et al, 67 Rafiei and Asadzadeh, 68 Keshavarz et al, 69 Keshavarz and Asadzadeh, 70 and Kazemi et al 71 proposed some novel approaches for medical risk-adjustment monitoring. Also, Grigg and Farewell, 72 Woodall, 73 Cook et al, 74 and Woodall et al 75 reviewed the use of risk-adjusted control charts in health services.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were followed by researchers such as Steiner et al, [41][42][43] Alemi and Olivier, 44 Cook et al, 45 Sego et al, 46,47 Cockings et al, 48 Grigg and Spiegelhalter, 49 Steiner and Jones, 50 Cook et al, 51 Chen et al, 52 Szarka and Woodall, 53 Paynabar and Jin, 54 Shojaei and Niaki, 55 Tian et al, 56 Mohammadian et al, 57 Zhang et al, 58 Zhang and Woodall, [59][60][61] and Sparks 62 who developed the risk-adjusted control charts. In recent years, Sachlas et al, 63 Begun et al, 64 Roy et al, 65 Ali et al, 66 Ding et al, 67 Rafiei and Asadzadeh, 68 Keshavarz et al, 69 Keshavarz and Asadzadeh, 70 and Kazemi et al 71 proposed some novel approaches for medical risk-adjustment monitoring. Also, Grigg and Farewell, 72 Woodall, 73 Cook et al, 74 and Woodall et al 75 reviewed the use of risk-adjusted control charts in health services.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Olteanu 12 proposed likelihood ratio-based CUSUM control charts for right-censored data assuming Weibull distribution. Accelerated failure time (AFT) regression chart is also proposed by Asadzadeh et al 5 Zhang et al 13 presented a risk-adjusted 14 Shewhart scheme to monitor phase-1 data. Asadayyoobi and Niaki 15 discussed a general phase-1 AFT risk-adjusted chart to monitor continuous surgical outcomes using changepoint methodology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sogandi et al 9 proposed a risk adjusted Bernoulli chart for the process of multistage healthcare by using the state-space model with dynamic probability control limits and obtained satisfactory results under different shifts. Ali et al 10 studied to evaluate the effect of risk adjusted EWMA and CUSUM control chart conducted by the estimation error. Ding et al 11 persist in the use of the most accurate method for surgical outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%