1992
DOI: 10.2307/2109666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Effect of Opportunity Cost on International Reserve Holdings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
18
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature on the demand for foreign exchange reserves includes numerous research studies investigating especially the effect of the opportunity cost on reserve holdings: Ben-Bassat Gottlieb, 1992;Badinger, 2004;Prabheesh et al, 2007;Bastourre et al, 2009. Ben-Bassat Gottlieb (1992 found a negative relationship between the demand for foreign exchange reserves and the opportunity cost of holding these reserves.…”
Section: The Intervention Model the Asset Choice Model And The Vulnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature on the demand for foreign exchange reserves includes numerous research studies investigating especially the effect of the opportunity cost on reserve holdings: Ben-Bassat Gottlieb, 1992;Badinger, 2004;Prabheesh et al, 2007;Bastourre et al, 2009. Ben-Bassat Gottlieb (1992 found a negative relationship between the demand for foreign exchange reserves and the opportunity cost of holding these reserves.…”
Section: The Intervention Model the Asset Choice Model And The Vulnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The opportunity cost of holding international reserves plays an important role in all theoretical models of the demand for reserves, yet most empirical studies have been unable to find a significant opportunity cost effect. Ben‐Bassat and Gottlieb (1992 b ) show that when the opportunity cost is measured properly, it can be a significant determinant of reserve demand 8 . Ideally, the opportunity cost should be measured as the difference between the highest possible marginal productivity forgone from an alternative investment in fixed assets and the yield on international reserves.…”
Section: Empirical Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“… See Hipple (1979), Bahmani‐Oskooee (1985), Edwards (1985) and Ben‐Bassat and Gottlieb (1992 b ) for further discussion on measuring the opportunity cost variable empirically. Ben‐Bassat and Gottlieb (1992 b ) computed a more appropriate measure of the opportunity cost of holding reserves for Israel during the 1968–88 period. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heller and Khan (1978) further investigates the question raised by Frenkel (1978), for which they estimate ARIMA models for reserves of the six country groupings with quarterly data over the period 1964-76. Following the model specifi cation of Frenkel and Jovanovic (1981), Ben-Bassat and Gottlieb (1992) tried to estimate the opportunity cost with respect to demand for reserves but fi nd that the OLS estimates were ineffi cient with biased t-values. They thus opted for autoregressive process, moving average and a synchronisation of both techniques and found that the fi rst order moving average produced the best result as it signifi cantly improved parameter estimates.…”
Section: Review Of Methodological Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we accept the use of time discounting as a method of comparing the economic values of consumption in different time periods, then sustainability appears to mean nothing more than effi cient resource allocation -a concept already well established in economics. Ben-Bassat and Gottlieb (1992) in an empirical study of the effect of opportunity cost on international reserve holding on Israel during the period 1968 -1988 found that if measured correctly, opportunity cost plays a pivot role in determining reserves. Dow (2001) estimated the demand for excess reserves in the United States and fi nds that excess reserves are negatively related to the Federal funds rate and positively related to transactions deposits.…”
Section: Review Of Empirical Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%