1958
DOI: 10.1121/1.1909559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Effect of Practice and Motivation on the Threshold of Audibility

Abstract: The thresholds of audibility for 100 and for 1000 cps have been measured on five groups of originally naive listeners by various experimental techniques. All the experiments showed improvement of the threshold with practice. The improvement was greater at 100 cps than at 1000 cps. Pretraining at 1000 cps did not affect the threshold change at 100 cps. The improvement of the threshold with practice was enhanced considerably by reward and feedback.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
74
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
74
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We did observe a weak tendency for detection thresholds to improve with session number, consistent with findings of other researchers (e.g., Zwislocki et al 1958;Henry et al 2001 and references therein). Because listeners differed in their absolute thresholds, we first calculated for each listener and session the detection threshold (in dB SPL), L T(D) , for the reference stimulus (Methods), and then the difference between the L T(D) of each individual session and the mean L T(D) across all sessions, DL T(D) .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…We did observe a weak tendency for detection thresholds to improve with session number, consistent with findings of other researchers (e.g., Zwislocki et al 1958;Henry et al 2001 and references therein). Because listeners differed in their absolute thresholds, we first calculated for each listener and session the detection threshold (in dB SPL), L T(D) , for the reference stimulus (Methods), and then the difference between the L T(D) of each individual session and the mean L T(D) across all sessions, DL T(D) .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The parameters were chosen so that the function matched closely the psychometric function shown in Fig. 15 of Zwislocki et al (4).…”
Section: Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter was controlled by an electronic logic according to the Zwislocki et al (4) rule. Every time an incorrect response occurred, the attenuation decreased by a 1-dB step.…”
Section: Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations