2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2023.108479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the effectiveness of double-double design on crashworthiness of fuselage barrel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The FE model of a representative portion of a short‐range regional aircraft composite fuselage barrel has been implemented in the Abaqus environment. [ 13 ] An aircraft seat with rigid body features has been added on the window‐side to properly locate a 50th percentile male WorldSID‐based FE dummy model to simulate the side impact with the fuselage wall. Details on the structure's geometry and material employment are given in Figure .…”
Section: Description Of Finite Element Model Of the Fuselage Barrelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FE model of a representative portion of a short‐range regional aircraft composite fuselage barrel has been implemented in the Abaqus environment. [ 13 ] An aircraft seat with rigid body features has been added on the window‐side to properly locate a 50th percentile male WorldSID‐based FE dummy model to simulate the side impact with the fuselage wall. Details on the structure's geometry and material employment are given in Figure .…”
Section: Description Of Finite Element Model Of the Fuselage Barrelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Main structural sub-components have been modelled as solid extruded parts while frames as 3D shell parts allowing to run sequential analyses with variable thickness during the optimization process. The optimized [±37.5, ±45] Double-Double lay-up has been employed for the skin [4]. A uniform [90,45,0,45,-45,90,45,-45,0,-45,45,-45]s stacking sequence characterized the frames in the starting configuration.…”
Section: Fe Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A uniform [90,45,0,45,-45,90,45,-45,0,-45,45,-45]s stacking sequence characterized the frames in the starting configuration. The IMS/977-2 CFRP [4], a Woven Fabric [4] and the T700 CPLY64 [4] have been adopted for the composite components while Aluminum 2024-T42 for the metal parts. The FE model has been discretized by means of 8node continuum shell elements (SC8R) and 8-node linear brick elements (C3D8R) for composite and aluminum components, respectively, while 4-node general-purpose shell elements (S4R) have been used for frames.…”
Section: Fe Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aircraft structural response is mainly dominated by the crash response characteristics of typical fuselage section with straight cross section [5][6][7], and conducting the drop test of full-scale fuselage section (including occupant/seat restraint system) is the most direct and effective way to research and verify the aircraft crashworthiness, which can effectively evaluate the fuselage structure deformation, the load transmitted to the seats and occupants and occupant injury risk, etc. Many drop tests of typical fuselage section had been carried out, as listed in Table 1, and the fuselage section presented two different failure modes according to the drop test results: the unrolling failure mode (three plastic hinges failure mode) and the flattening failure mode (multiple plastic hinges failure mode).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%