1987
DOI: 10.1016/s0232-4393(87)80062-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the efficiency of soil sterilization in autoclave

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While studying abiotic transformation of nitrate, Dail et al [35] observed an increase of >30‐fold in dissolved organic carbon in an acid forest soil. Because autoclaving kills the bacteria and not the spores [36], the one autoclaving done in the present study may not have been sufficient to sterilize the samples since sterilization procedures such as autoclaving, gamma irradiation, and addition of HgCl 2 have been found to increase bacterial activity in sediments after up to three weeks of [33]. Other possible explanation is that in the active treatments, sorption occurred such that material was not extractable under the extraction conditions and autoclaving changed the chemistry to such an extent that sorption process was hindered.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While studying abiotic transformation of nitrate, Dail et al [35] observed an increase of >30‐fold in dissolved organic carbon in an acid forest soil. Because autoclaving kills the bacteria and not the spores [36], the one autoclaving done in the present study may not have been sufficient to sterilize the samples since sterilization procedures such as autoclaving, gamma irradiation, and addition of HgCl 2 have been found to increase bacterial activity in sediments after up to three weeks of [33]. Other possible explanation is that in the active treatments, sorption occurred such that material was not extractable under the extraction conditions and autoclaving changed the chemistry to such an extent that sorption process was hindered.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two enzymatic pathways for N 2 O production in AOB, from hydroxylamine and NO suggested to be 31%-75% of total N 2 O production in non-sterile agricultural soils (Venterea, 2007). However, there are difficulties in studying sterilized soil including incomplete sterilization, alteration of soil properties and an absence of biotic production of hydroxylamine or NO − 2 , which are precursors for abiotic production (Lotrario et al, 1995;McNamara, Black, Beresford, & Parekh, 2003;Nowak & Wronkowska, 1987). Wrage-Mönnig et al, 2018), although their ability to distinguish autotrophic and heterotrophic processes has been questioned .…”
Section: Linked Biotic and Abiotic Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While studying abiotic transformation of nitrate, Dail et al [35] observed an increase of Ͼ30-fold in dissolved organic carbon in an acid forest soil. Because autoclaving kills the bacteria and not the spores [36], the one autoclaving done in the present study may not have been sufficient to sterilize the samples since sterilization procedures such as autoclaving, gamma irradiation, and addition of HgCl 2 have been found to increase bacterial activity in sediments after up to three weeks of [33]. Other possible explanation is that in the active treatments, sorption occurred such that material was not extractable under the extraction conditions and autoclaving changed the chemistry to such an extent that sorption process was hindered.…”
Section: Incongruent Findings and Possible Reasoningmentioning
confidence: 99%