1981
DOI: 10.1137/1125059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Efficiency of Spectral Density Estimates of a Stationary Process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is the result obtained by Zhurbenko (1980b), Theorem 4; see also (1979a), Theorem 4 and (1980a), Theorem 3.…”
Section: The Mean Square Errorsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This is the result obtained by Zhurbenko (1980b), Theorem 4; see also (1979a), Theorem 4 and (1980a), Theorem 3.…”
Section: The Mean Square Errorsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Zhurbenko investigates the mean square error of fN(A) and considers a sequence aM(t) which leads to a smaller mean square error than the commonly used window-type spectral density estimates (see e.g. Zhurbenko (1980b)). He further shows that the statistic is less sensitive to disturbances from outlying frequencies than the window estimates (Zhurbenko (1983), Theorem 8 and Theorem 11, see also Zhurbenko and Kozhevnikova (1982)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For smooth spectral densities this estimate has roughly the same mean 162 R. Dahlhaus sequare error as the window estimate (with global bandwith). Zhurbenko (1980) proves for a particular taper ht, N and Lipschitz-continuous spectral densities that the mean square error of the estimate is lower than the mean square error of the window estimate with several common windows but higher than the optimal window estimate. Furthermore, Zhurbenko (1983) shows by considering a spectral measure with a jump that the segment estimate is less sensitive to disturbances from outlying frequencies than the window estimate (Zhurbenko, 1983, Theorem 8 and Theorem 11).…”
Section: T= Lm+ N-lmentioning
confidence: 94%