2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2015.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the efficient numerical solution of lattice systems with low-order couplings

Abstract: We apply the Quasi Monte Carlo (QMC) and recursive numerical integration methods to evaluate the Euclidean, discretized time path-integral for the quantum mechanical anharmonic oscillator and a topological quantum mechanical rotor model. For the anharmonic oscillator both methods outperform standard Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods and show a significantly improved error scaling. For the quantum mechanical rotor we could, however, not find a successful way employing QMC. On the other hand, the recursive numeri… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing RNI directly with the for this model optimal MCMC Cluster algorithm shows an improvement of the error for RNI of several orders of magnitude even for a number of integration points where we are not yet in the intermediate, exponentially fast error scaling regime. Further applications of RNI to the anharmonic oscillator are reported in [9] and show extremely good results over a very broad range of parameters.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Comparing RNI directly with the for this model optimal MCMC Cluster algorithm shows an improvement of the error for RNI of several orders of magnitude even for a number of integration points where we are not yet in the intermediate, exponentially fast error scaling regime. Further applications of RNI to the anharmonic oscillator are reported in [9] and show extremely good results over a very broad range of parameters.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Hence neither term can suppress the error of the other which we interpret as the cause of the peak in the relative error. Figure 4 shows the same comparison as Figure 3 but computations were performed with 1024bit floating point arithmetic, 6 i.e., approximately 307 digit precision. Again, we observe that the polynomially exact method operates on machine precision (as to be expected).…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with c 1 := n j=1m j , c 2 = 2 −n e −nµ , and c 3 = (−1) n 2 −n e nµ . Mathematically speaking, (6) is an application of "Fubini" 1 and translation invariance of the Haar measure since det D only depends on n−1 j=0 U j . We will frequently assume this form of D in analytic computations and we have implemented this form of D in order to reduce computational overhead.…”
Section: One Dimensional Lattice Qcdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the future we would like to see QMC in new territories, to tackle a significantly wider range of more realistic problems. Some emerging new application areas of QMC include e.g., Bayesian inversion [8,72], stochastic wave propagation [20,21], quantum field theory [3,47], and neutron transport [23,36].…”
Section: Software Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%