2014
DOI: 10.2140/apde.2014.7.1365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the eigenvalues of Aharonov–Bohm operators with varying poles

Abstract: We consider a magnetic operator of Aharonov-Bohm type with Dirichlet boundary conditions in a planar domain. We analyse the behavior of its eigenvalues as the singular pole moves in the domain. For any value of the circulation we prove that the k-th magnetic eigenvalue converges to the k-th eigenvalue of the Laplacian as the pole approaches the boundary. We show that the magnetic eigenvalues depend in a smooth way on the position of the pole, as long as they remain simple. In case of half-integer circulation, … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
79
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that X is a critical point is proved in the case N = 1 for the minimal 3-partitions of a simply connected domain in [6]. As far as we know, our result is new for a general k-partition.…”
Section: The Map U (T) Is Unitary and Satises U (T)(cmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The fact that X is a critical point is proved in the case N = 1 for the minimal 3-partitions of a simply connected domain in [6]. As far as we know, our result is new for a general k-partition.…”
Section: The Map U (T) Is Unitary and Satises U (T)(cmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…During the writing of this work, S. Terracini showed us a preliminary version of the paper [6]. It contains a similar continuity result, restricted to the case of one pole and assuming Ω to be simply connected with a C ∞ -boundary.…”
Section: Nmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Let us fix ε 1 and ε 2 in (0, ε 0 ] such that ε 1 > ε 2 . Since H 1 0 (Ω) ⊂ Q ε2 ⊂ Q ε1 , the definitions given by Formulas (6) and (7) immediately imply that λ j (ε 1 ) ≤ λ j (ε 2 ) ≤ λ j for each integer j ≥ 1. The function (0, ε 0 ] ∋ ε → λ j (ε) is therefore non-increasing and bounded by λ j for each integer j ≥ 1.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%