1973
DOI: 10.1088/0305-4470/6/2/007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the elastic Schwarzschild scattering cross section

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
456
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 276 publications
(468 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
10
456
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The formula also makes it clear that the low velocity limit recovers the Rutherford formula. The higher order relativistic corrections are not obvious, but do agree with the small angle formulae obtained by Collins et al [2], who found that as θ → 0 the classical cross section is given by…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The formula also makes it clear that the low velocity limit recovers the Rutherford formula. The higher order relativistic corrections are not obvious, but do agree with the small angle formulae obtained by Collins et al [2], who found that as θ → 0 the classical cross section is given by…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The formula neatly embodies the equivalence principle, in that the cross-section depends only on the particle's velocity, and not its mass. In the low-angle limit our formula agrees with earlier results for the classical cross-section based on the geodesic equation [2].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To show this, we are going to use the timelike geodesic equations that describe the motion of a particle in a Schwarzschild metric. The trajectory for nonrelativistic particles (such as the WIMPs) is given by [17] du d…”
Section: Wimp's Accretion Rate Onto the Neutron Starmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geodesic analysis is an important approximation because at very high frequencies the wave propagates along null geodesics. 12 The semiclassical approach captures the wave interferences, although it fails to describe the differential scattering cross section for low angles. 13 Finally, the planar wave analysis describes the full phenomenology, with the drawback of having to solve the full wave equation (usually numerically).…”
Section: Wave Analysis and Approximationsmentioning
confidence: 99%