2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2022.111433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the elastic wedge problem within simplified and incomplete strain gradient elasticity theories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The classical part is defined in a standard PN form through the harmonic vector and harmonic function, while the gradient part is simply represented through the modified Helmholtz decomposition. In such a way we prove the correctness of the previously supposed simplified form of PN solution within SGET [44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The classical part is defined in a standard PN form through the harmonic vector and harmonic function, while the gradient part is simply represented through the modified Helmholtz decomposition. In such a way we prove the correctness of the previously supposed simplified form of PN solution within SGET [44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The key point of the presented results is the proposed modified definition of Galerkin stress function and its specific relations to the Papkovich stress functions within SGET that have not been established previously for the best of author's knowledge. Applications of the obtained results can be related to the wide class of boundary value problems that can be solved analytically in a simple manner by using PN representation for which we show the completeness [40,44,48]. Incorporation of complete general solutions into the numerical schemes (like in a Trefftz method) can be also an important issue for the development of stable and flexible numerical solvers within SGET [39,49].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We can formulate Hooke’s law to define the stress tensor as a linear combination of the volumetric and deviatoric strain tensors: where K is the bulk modulus and G is the shear modulus. From Equation ( 1 ), it is possible then to recognize the two contributions to the stress, namely the hydrostatic: and shear or deviatoric part: This formulation can be generalized by using mechanical micromorphic [ 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 ], micropolar [ 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 ], higher-order [ 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 ], or peridynamic [ 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 ] models. As an opening move, the stiffnesses can be evaluated starting with the knowledge of the engineering parameters, Young’s modulus Y , and Poisson’s ratio as follows: since they are more str...…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%