1977
DOI: 10.1007/bf02725817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the electron states of SnSe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values of the electron energy ( E ) as a function of wave vector (k) are displayed by the points. Such a manner of representing the results of band structure calculation has been previously used by the authors of [14]. The points are not connected due to the complicated band structure.…”
Section: T a B L Ementioning
confidence: 98%
“…The values of the electron energy ( E ) as a function of wave vector (k) are displayed by the points. Such a manner of representing the results of band structure calculation has been previously used by the authors of [14]. The points are not connected due to the complicated band structure.…”
Section: T a B L Ementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Despite the large interest in electronic properties of semiconductor crystals of the type IV-VI, theoretical investigations of the electron band structure of orthorhombic chalcogenides GeS, GeSe, SnS, and SnSe have only been performed at point I ' for the SnS compound [l, 21 and on some symmetry lines for GeS [3]. Further a partial and preliminar account of present results has been reported [4]. Indeed, the low symmetry, the high number of atoms in the unit cell and the high average number of electrons per atom pose rather severe computational constraints and make the electron state calculation for these compounds more complicate than for t,he rocksalt ones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first calculations of the energy band structure of SnSe were carried out by the pseudopotential method in [14,151. The obtained value of the indirect gap -2.1 eV is approximately twice higher than the experimental one (0.9 eV [2, 31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%