Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 7th International Conference on Mobile Software Engineering and Systems 2020
DOI: 10.1145/3387905.3388610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the elicitation of privacy and ethics preferences of mobile users

Abstract: Nowadays, mobile users are constantly being connected and increasingly asked to express their personal preferences in the digital world. User preferences deal with simple device settings options, like notification alarms, as well as relevant ethical choices relating to the user behavior, privacy ones included (e.g., concerning the unauthorized disclosure and mining of personal data, as well as the access to restricted resources). All these preferences define the user, they are the building blocks of her digita… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…a software shield that protects them and their personal data through the mediation of all interactions with the digital world that would result in unacceptable or morally wrong behaviors according to their ethical and privacy preferences. The exoskeleton relies on the ethical profiling of a user, similar in purpose to the privacy profiling proposed in the literature [61,20], but aiming at reflecting general moral preferences and predicting user's digital behaviors accordingly like proposed in [41]. More precisely, EXOSOUL is based on the notion of digital ethics [23] and its separation in soft ethics to reflect user's ethics and hard ethics to define the ethical values a digital system shall comply with.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a software shield that protects them and their personal data through the mediation of all interactions with the digital world that would result in unacceptable or morally wrong behaviors according to their ethical and privacy preferences. The exoskeleton relies on the ethical profiling of a user, similar in purpose to the privacy profiling proposed in the literature [61,20], but aiming at reflecting general moral preferences and predicting user's digital behaviors accordingly like proposed in [41]. More precisely, EXOSOUL is based on the notion of digital ethics [23] and its separation in soft ethics to reflect user's ethics and hard ethics to define the ethical values a digital system shall comply with.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a software shield that protects them and their personal data through the mediation of all interactions with the digital world that would result in unacceptable or morally wrong behaviors according to their ethical and privacy preferences. The exoskeleton relies on the ethical profiling of a user, similar in purpose to the privacy profiling proposed in the literature [60,20], but aiming at reflecting general moral preferences and predicting user's digital behaviors accordingly like proposed in [40]. More precisely, EXOSOUL is based on the notion of digital ethics [23] and its separation in soft ethics to reflect user's ethics and hard ethics to define the ethical values a digital system shall comply with.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the case of privacy preferences in the app domain [12] to the more complex case of autonomous driving cars [4] the average user is unprotected and inadeguate in her interaction with the digital world. In the talk I will present the approach and preliminary results undertaken in the project EXOSOUL [2,[8][9][10][11] that stands on the side of users. EXOSOUL aims at equipping humans with an automatically generated exoskeleton, a software shield that protects and empowers them and their personal data in all interactions with the digital world by mediating or discarding those ones that would result in unacceptable or morally wrong behaviors according to the user's ethical and privacy preferences [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%